Contributor
•
1 Message
AT&T PREPAID vs. Cricket
Cricket is owned by AT&T, Cricket is cheaper, and Cricket uses the AT&T network, so I thought why not switch to Cricket. I read on the forum that AT&T has faster download speeds.
I've also been hearing that the cell reception is not the same. A friend who has AT&T was in the remote Santa Cruz mountains, and he had cellphone service for calls and internet, but others who had Cricket, T-Mobile, and Sprint had no service.
Are there other disadvantages with going with Cricket?
patrickal04
Tutor
•
2 Messages
5 years ago
Respectfully, no that is incorrect. I have an AT&T Velocity prepaid mobile hotspot device. It works all over Wyoming in areas depicted on AT&T coverage viewer as partner coverage. That is confirmed by me, a trucker who also has Verizon and travels everywhere. Trust me AT&T Prepaid works on extended network. Cricket does not. Go with prepaid go phone. You have roaming capabilities.
0
srosen40
Tutor
•
6 Messages
4 years ago
Cricket has both WiFi Calling and Hotspot. Hotspot costs an additional $10 per month per line
3
0
Johnalec2
New Member
•
2 Messages
4 years ago
I dont think thats true
0
0
Johnalec2
New Member
•
2 Messages
4 years ago
I dont think thats true
0
0