Contributor
•
3 Messages
Longhorn Network - Just say 'No'
I greatly appreciate the value provided by AT&T in bundling tv/wireless/internet services. Similarly, the bundling of channels allows customers to access a variety of programming at substantial savings.
However, occasionally, programming comes along that is so expensive and directed at such a narrow, niche market that it deserves to be left off of the programming options or ordered solely as an 'a la carte' option. If the reports about the price tag to cable providers to offer the 'longhorn network' (by ESPN) are accurate, the only way it could be added to current bundled programming packages is at substantial cost to MANY people who have no interest in the programming.
Please AT&T, keep prices low, by either not offering or charging ONLY those who desire this programming option.
Thanks!
JefferMC
ACE - Expert
•
35.4K Messages
12 years ago
Well, I'm not really interested in any of the channels that you listed--or the Longhorn Network--but I know there are customers who wanted this content. They can be happy. You (and the Texas A&M fans) won't be. Can't please everyone.
0
0
Ish Kabibble
Scholar
•
177 Messages
12 years ago
You are probably right. I believe I read that TWC has split tiering for the Pac 10 network.
0
0
oufanindallas
ACE - Master
•
6.9K Messages
12 years ago
I have a soon to be 4yr old and I'm a hockey fan so both Disney Jr and NHL network would please me. Definately not a fan of the university down in Austin, but if OU is playing them in other sports besides football then I may venture over there to watch. Glad one hurdle has been jumped, now to quite the left coasters and get the Pac-12 network(s).
0
spd2demun
Expert
•
24.3K Messages
12 years ago
Apparently you were right!
0
0
Uniblurb3
Master
•
5.7K Messages
12 years ago
Yeah, I have the LHN on 1609 in the Central Ohio market with U450. I'll probably cutting my service back to U300!
0
Ish Kabibble
Scholar
•
177 Messages
12 years ago
I turned it on yesterday to check it out. I'll probably never watch it again.
0
0
Uniblurb3
Master
•
5.7K Messages
12 years ago
Same here. Don't know if there's any other college teams which have their own separate network? Believe it's mainly leagues like the BTN (1650) channel here. Heck, the high schools here can barely get by financially, with lots of cutbacks, let alone building a $60M HS stadium in Allen, a suburb of Dallas. This story has been all over the national news and a 800 member HS band to boot! But the voters wanted it, willing to pay for the bond issue, so it's not being supported through an education/school levy.
Oh well, I remember visiting my mom years ago where she retired in NC and they would pull prime-time OTA programming to show local HS basketball!
Sorry for going a little off-topic.
0
0
skeeterintexas
ACE - Expert
•
27.8K Messages
12 years ago
Being that I grew up in Texas and Friday night football is ingrained into my brain, I didn't realize that local football (High School and/or college) would raise such ire.
I worked with an Aggie who lived and breathed the maroon & white. I didn't get it but I knew to NEVER mention them and UT or Texas Tech in the same breath lest you get an entire lecture on the subject.
0
0
AchtungCloud
Tutor
•
2 Messages
12 years ago
I'm pretty annoyed that Uverse decided to pick up this albatross of a network that destroyed the Big 12 and the best rivalry in college sports. I guess they figured people really wanted to watch a .500 team with no QB and follow it up with women's college volleyball and softball the rest of the year.
0
0
spd2demun
Expert
•
24.3K Messages
12 years ago
ATT is HQ'd in TX, though not Austin, but maybe a lot of UT grads/fans?
0
0