New Member
•
2 Messages
ksdk/nbc channels????? in st. louis
Unfortunately, so far, DIRECTV and AT&T U-Verse have refused to reach a fair, market-based agreement with us. If a deal is not reached by 7:00 p.m. CST on November 30, DIRECTV and AT&T U-Verse subscribers could lose access to KSDK. come on ATT
dont forget who pays for this service, i guess we can cancel and spend our money some where else, which would be phone, internet, & uverse,
sandblaster
ACE - Expert
•
64.7K Messages
3 years ago
I’m in the same market, I’ve got Directv. This happens every year or every other year. I don’t recall channel 5 ever going dark, they have always reached an agreement. However, are you really OK with KSDK demanding more money? Why should they get paid for something they give away free over the air? Why should they get more money from cable and satellite providers who are doing them a favor by delivering their programming to locations their over the air signal can’t reach? Seems to me they should be paying the tv providers, not the other way around. You do realize we are the ones paying for their demands. I’m rather tired of my bill going up every year.
0
JefferMC
ACE - Expert
•
35.3K Messages
3 years ago
Tegna must have started their crawlers. Second post from one of their stations today.
0
0
sandblaster
ACE - Expert
•
64.7K Messages
3 years ago
@JefferMC Yes, they have. Actually started last night.
0
0
JefferMC
ACE - Expert
•
35.3K Messages
3 years ago
I wish both sides would be required to disclose their idea of "fair, market-based" during the negotiations.
0
baseballisback
ACE - Professor
•
7.7K Messages
3 years ago
I agree with Jeffer.
What is "fair" for a customer to pay when that customer can get it for free (and uncompressed!) with an antenna? Essentially, all we're doing is paying for the right to record shows and even then, there's an app that shows go on the day after. Even if they take away access to the archives via the NBC app, the Peacock app is a good value.
The TV providers make the channel owners look bad by wanting to raise rates. The channel owners make the TV providers look bad by refusing to cowtow to increased carriage fees.
Eventually, that all comes out to that "Local Channel Carriage Fee" which goes up and up every year.
On a related note, the owners of my local NBC are running a crawl about DISH not wanting to pay up. I think DISH is in something like eight different disputes (and now maybe Nexstar) and they haven't had HBO in well over a year.
(edited)
0
0
stacey8640
New Member
•
2 Messages
3 years ago
If AT&T U-Verse losses KSDK/nbc channel, there will be one less customer. I will be spending my money with another cable company. Might switch internet, too.
0
0
davemize
ACE - Professor
•
3.7K Messages
3 years ago
{smh} At least take the time to learn a little bit about the situation before forming opinions. It's a little like politics.... matter of fact, it's a *lot* like politics...
0
mark42554
New Member
•
2 Messages
3 years ago
I have had U Verse for years and would be very disappointed if KSDK were dropped. Please settle this!
0
Beans4
New Member
•
2 Messages
3 years ago
Really, first because of the Nielsen ratings we lost our local channels in Springfield Missouri, now these two can't agree, maybe it's time to look elsewhere for phone, tv and internet service.
0
0
baseballisback
ACE - Professor
•
7.7K Messages
3 years ago
I don't think Nielsen ratings have to do with channel owners pulling their products.
0
0