• Favorite forums
  • My latest badges
My latest badges
Subject Forum Replies New Author Views Last Post
This is a topic with new unread messages

0 0 0 0
Blog Idea Exchange There are no unread messages in this message board Q&A This is a topic with new unread messages This is a popular topic with no new messages This is a topic that you have replied to with new unread messages This is a popular topic that you have replied to with new unread messages This is a popular topic that you have replied to with new unread messages There are no new messages in this topic Solved! Message contains an attachment Message contains no text Message contains a video Message contains an image
View profile
Created: Sep 30, 2009
crewxp Created: Sep. 30, 2009
Doppler808 wrote: It is a major loss. The 2G does not produce them money... Tell me how does supporting the 2G produce them money when they do not produce the 2G's and sell them off their shelves? So by supporting the phone, parts, updates, and tech support they are spending money. So profit for 2G is negative. If they still produced and sold the first generation even in ...
Wireless Forum  •
1,0981098 views
0
View profile
Created: Sep 30, 2009
crewxp Created: Sep. 30, 2009
Doppler808 wrote: Sorry makes no difference. 3.0 is a completely rewritten to slowly phase out the 2G. This actually saves them time and gives a few more years to the 2G device for support. Which is already a lot longer than the usual life span of cell phones. Usually use per person of a cell phone is 2 years. By the time they fully phase out the 2G it'll be 3-4 years. Th...
Wireless Forum  •
1,1141114 views
0
View profile
Created: Sep 30, 2009
crewxp Created: Sep. 30, 2009
Doppler808 wrote: crewxp wrote: Doppler808 wrote: HAAHAHHAH. The people who wrote that article failed to mention research and development costs. Production costs. Shipping costs. Trademark fees, pantent fees, FCC fees, and lawyer fees to help with the FCC, trademark, pantents to help make sure they are not infringing on anyone. Don't forget the developers who make the OS....
Wireless Forum  •
1,1341134 views
0
View profile
Created: Sep 30, 2009
crewxp Created: Sep. 30, 2009
Demetri70 wrote: OMG ohhh noes Companies looking to make a profit! What's next, soon they will try and make you buy there new products "gasp" You've got a grammar error bud... But yeah, companies are out to make a profit. That's the point that people should get, instead of spreading around that the 2g isn't getting these new features due to hardware concerns or the fact t...
Wireless Forum  •
1,2531253 views
0
View profile
Created: Sep 30, 2009
crewxp Created: Sep. 30, 2009
Doppler808 wrote: HAAHAHHAH. The people who wrote that article failed to mention research and development costs. Production costs. Shipping costs. Trademark fees, pantent fees, FCC fees, and lawyer fees to help with the FCC, trademark, pantents to help make sure they are not infringing on anyone. Don't forget the developers who make the OS. I mean just the bare minimum of...
Wireless Forum  •
1,1591159 views
0
View profile
Created: Sep 30, 2009
crewxp Created: Sep. 30, 2009
Doppler808 wrote: Yes they do. It was just subsidized which AT&T coughs up money so you can have that new toy which you will pay back over the course of your contract. It's just to lower your initial cost. This is why I say screw the subsidization. People always forget providers cough up some initial cash. When the first blackberry first came out it was 547.84 here in Haw...
Wireless Forum  •
1,1721172 views
0
View profile
Created: Sep 30, 2009
crewxp Created: Sep. 30, 2009
Demetri70 wrote: crewxp wrote: Doppler808 wrote: It doesn't matter loyal or not loyal. It has nothing to do with it. As time progresses old technology gets phased out. People need to learn how to let things go in this regard. If you don't want to let it go to keep up with the times you can't complain about what has what. Look at the PS3. They phased out all the PS2 games....
Wireless Forum  •
1,1881188 views
0
View profile
Created: Sep 29, 2009
crewxp Created: Sep. 29, 2009
Doppler808 wrote: It doesn't matter loyal or not loyal. It has nothing to do with it. As time progresses old technology gets phased out. People need to learn how to let things go in this regard. If you don't want to let it go to keep up with the times you can't complain about what has what. Look at the PS3. They phased out all the PS2 games. Nintendo phased out all their ...
Wireless Forum  •
1,1591159 views
0
View profile
Created: Sep 29, 2009
crewxp Created: Sep. 29, 2009
BrianfromNO wrote: The iPhone 2G has no 3G radio in it. Just as Apple didn't develop Snow Leopard to work on older Macs that have Power PC processors, they didn't develop MMS to work with the iPhone 2G. It's as simple as that. crewxp wrote: BrianfromNO wrote: No, they are not. Completely different cellular radio in them. No..... The third revision of the PMB87xx series ch...
Wireless Forum  •
2,3512351 views
0
View profile
Created: Sep 29, 2009
crewxp Created: Sep. 29, 2009
BrianfromNO wrote: No, they are not. Completely different cellular radio in them. No..... The third revision of the PMB87xx series chipset doesn't really count as a 'completely different cellular radio' than the 2g. Only a small layout change and a higher unlock of the already present UMTS frequency is different. Hardware has no bearing on Apple and AT&T's decision to not...
Wireless Forum  •
2,3662366 views
0
View profile
Created: Sep 29, 2009
crewxp Created: Sep. 29, 2009
I'ld be okay with that.... IF I didn't pay $700 for the phone only 2 years ago... It was a big mistake me buying the iPhone. Oh well. Nothing I can do. They really don't treat their faithful customers well (Apple).
Wireless Forum  •
1,4481448 views
0
View profile
Created: Sep 29, 2009
crewxp Created: Sep. 29, 2009
question.... was the 2g left out in the mms update?
Wireless Forum  •
898898 views
0
crewxp has no accepted solutions.
crewxp has no activity.
Activity Feed for crewxp

Uploaded Images for crewxp

No images available.