• Favorite forums
  • My latest badges
My latest badges
Subject Forum Replies New Author Views Last Post
This is a topic with new unread messages

0 0 0 0
Blog Idea Exchange There are no unread messages in this message board Q&A This is a topic with new unread messages This is a popular topic with no new messages This is a topic that you have replied to with new unread messages This is a popular topic that you have replied to with new unread messages This is a popular topic that you have replied to with new unread messages There are no new messages in this topic Solved! Message contains an attachment Message contains no text Message contains a video Message contains an image
View profile
Created: Feb 6, 2013
ttx336 Created: Feb. 6, 2013
Gonna revive this old thread... Wireless channels: you can have multiples, I run 3 currently, and it is a sweet setup. Very much like the way our cell phones switch from tower to tower, my portable wireless devices such as phones and laptops just lock on the strongest signal as I move about the house. There are 4 caveats to this: One MUST: use the same security (WEP, WPA/...
U-verse Forums  •
35,92035K views
0
View profile
Created: May 22, 2012
ttx336 Created: May. 22, 2012
Yes, the target of the ssh is the PC, it does have a static IP of 192.168.1.5 On a whim, I shut the wireless radio off in my iPad so that I'd be coming in completely off my network, and viola! It works fine, why is that? The IP on the RG's WAN is, of course, different than my static IPs... I wonder why I cannot remote in or ssh in from a PC that's on the RG's network. All ...
U-verse Forums  •
1,7531753 views
0
View profile
Created: May 22, 2012
ttx336 Created: May. 22, 2012
that got me part of the way, now I can reach the router and I can ssh to the PC from a PC that is on the same WAN IPs as the R1 router, but if I try to ssh in or get to the R1 router via a PC that is not on the static IPs, it fails...
U-verse Forums  •
1,7591759 views
0
View profile
Created: May 22, 2012
ttx336 Created: May. 22, 2012
Ooh, just realized it should be 192.168.1.1 for the NAT to the router, 192.168.1.5 is for the PC, I'll report back once I try that.
U-verse Forums  •
1,7621762 views
0
View profile
Created: May 22, 2012
ttx336 Created: May. 22, 2012
I have the static NAT set up as: ip nat inside source static tcp 192.168.1.5 80 xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx 80 but I'm not sure about the options for extendable and no-payload, they don't seem to help when I try different ones... I turned on debug ip nat and the incoming port numbers are seemingly random so that it totally messing this up, I think, anyway. Why don't I see the port nu...
U-verse Forums  •
1,7881788 views
0
View profile
Created: May 22, 2012
ttx336 Created: May. 22, 2012
from the WAN... I will look into the static NAT, not sure I know how to do that but it makes sense now that you say it. I was trying to do it all dynamic and, yes, I can do it just fine from the LAN thank you!
U-verse Forums  •
1,7901790 views
0
View profile
Created: May 21, 2012
ttx336 Created: May. 21, 2012
I have a block of 8 static IPs, I have NAT setup and can use the Internet just fine, however, unless I disconnect the LAN cable to the router's inteface (effectively shutting it down) I cannot get to my 2621's http config interface page... additionally, I cannot ssh into the PC but we can take this one step at a time... here's my config: sh run Building configuration... C...
U-verse Forums  •
1,8091809 views
View profile
Created: Nov 14, 2011
ttx336 Created: Nov. 14, 2011
Aaaaccckk, I'm a dope, I had the first source list set to 172.162.0.0 instead of 172.16.0.0, I am surprised it worked at all. What was interesting was that after I had typed in "10.0.0.0" the router had changed it to "any" for the second surce list. I deleted both of them and put them back in and now they both read exactly as I typed them. And now, I can use both the teln...
U-verse Forums  •
1,0101010 views
0
View profile
Created: Nov 14, 2011
ttx336 Created: Nov. 14, 2011
I can only telnet in from the LAN that R1 is on, I made sure that the firewall is off in the RG for R1; seems like it should be accessible from the outside but it's not.
U-verse Forums  •
1,0151015 views
0
View profile
Created: Nov 14, 2011
ttx336 Created: Nov. 14, 2011
I notice that I can no longer remote in to the router from the Interent as I could before turning on NAT, is that becasue it now has more than one option for a route? I tried using xxx.xxx.xxx.66/R1 to specify the address and the router's name to see if that would do but it doesn't work. Is there still a way to address the router from the Internet?
U-verse Forums  •
1,0281028 views
0
View profile
Created: Nov 12, 2011
ttx336 Created: Nov. 12, 2011
Once again, you were dead-on, it is working great!! Thank you so much... now, I gotta get my homework done, I am working on CCNA, I'm taking the Routing Protocols class currently so I am about halfway through. I find this all to be most fascinating. We have been so satisfied with AT&T's U-verse... coming from Comcast running on coax, this has been a refreshing change. Las...
U-verse Forums  •
1,0601060 views
0
View profile
Created: Nov 11, 2011
ttx336 Created: Nov. 11, 2011
! version 12.3 service timestamps debug datetime msec service timestamps log datetime msec no service password-encryption ! hostname R1 ! boot-start-marker boot-end-marker ! ! memory-size iomem 10 no aaa new-model ip subnet-zero ip cef ! ! ip name-server xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx ip name-server xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx ! ! ! ! ! ! interface FastEthernet0/0 ip address 172.16.1.1 255.255.255....
U-verse Forums  •
1,0791079 views
0
ttx336 has no accepted solutions.
ttx336 has no activity.
Activity Feed for ttx336

Uploaded Images for ttx336