Possible Smithsonian channel move?

Mentor

Possible Smithsonian channel move?

Just out of curiousity, what would take for AT&T to consider moving a channel in the channel lineup?  Currently the Smithsonian channel is 118 and 1118.  I enjoy the channel.  I also enjoy the History channel, NGC and the Sci channel.  The latter channels are around the 1250 block in the lineup.  It seems to me that the Smithsonian channel fits into similar programming as those channels.  Why not move it to 250/1250?

Message 1 of 32 (3,238 Views)
ACE - Professor

Re: Possible Smithsonian channel move?


Beany wrote:

baseballisback wrote:

Beany wrote:

While we're at it I have always thought that HDNet Movies and MGM HD would fit nicely in the upper 1700s with FXM IFC Sundance TCM and the Sony Movie Channel.


I'm guessing that HDNet Movies is where it is because it's owned (is it still?)...either way, it USED to be owned by the same company that owned HDNet, now known as AXS.

 

 

All: Someone once told me that channel providers also negotiate for the spots on the lineup (in addition to tier and price.) Sometimes, they'll even pay the providers for better spots...hence, part of the reason why ESPN is 1602 and NBCSN is "buried" at 1640 and others are 1643 or 1634...

 

The above may or may not still be true, especially as how easy it is now to search for a channel or show by typing it into the on-screen guide.


HD Net Movies and Axs TV are still owned by Mark Cuban owner of the Dallas Mavericks.


 

Not entirely true, as I thought. Cuban still owns part:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AXS_TV#Purchase_and_conversion_to_AXS_TV

*The views and opinions expressed on this forum are purely my own. Any product claim, statistic, quote, or other representation about a product or service should be verified with the manufacturer, provider, or party.
Message 16 of 32 (2,932 Views)
Highlighted
Mentor

Re: Possible Smithsonian channel move?

Thanks dhascall.  I'll try that route too.

 

I hear you about it being a good fit at 1118 because of proximity to DSC at 1120.  But that's just one channel.  The other block,1250-1270, has about 10 comparable channels.  As someone else posted, in an ideal world, move DSC too!

Message 17 of 32 (2,917 Views)
ACE - Master

Re: Possible Smithsonian channel move?


NormChar wrote:

Thanks dhascall.  I'll try that route too.

 

I hear you about it being a good fit at 1118 because of proximity to DSC at 1120.  But that's just one channel.  The other block,1250-1270, has about 10 comparable channels.  As someone else posted, in an ideal world, move DSC too!


I think that the real issue is that U-Verse has "general interest:" channels in the 100, 200 and 400 channel range.  They could really shrink that down to just two, one hundred channel blocks but there are too many to squeeze into one, one hundred block.  That being said, I like UV's channel schema better than Comcast's, throw them anywhere mentality.  The DIY multiviewwould be the best way of keeping them together.

*The views and opinions expressed on this forum are purely my own. Any product claim, statistic, quote, or other representation about a product or service should be verified with the manufacturer, provider, or party.
Message 18 of 32 (2,914 Views)
Scholar

Re: Possible Smithsonian channel move?

I suspect there's something going on between cable operator and cable programmer for some of the moves that have been made by AT&T U-verse as discussed from this topic.

 

I certainly don't know anything specific. But these efforts shows.

Message 19 of 32 (2,890 Views)
ACE - Master

Re: Possible Smithsonian channel move?


LoveHD wrote:

I suspect there's something going on between cable operator and cable programmer for some of the moves that have been made by AT&T U-verse as discussed from this topic.

 

I certainly don't know anything specific. But these efforts shows.


I'm sure that is correct.

*The views and opinions expressed on this forum are purely my own. Any product claim, statistic, quote, or other representation about a product or service should be verified with the manufacturer, provider, or party.
Message 20 of 32 (2,843 Views)
Mentor

Re: Possible Smithsonian channel move?

Update on the inquiry.  I sent a message to Customer Support, as Dhascall suggested.  I got a very nice response from a Social Media Manager.  A possibly encouraging response at that.  He said he liked the suggestion and that it seems like a no brainer.  He also said that he would definitely refer the suggestion up to see if gets any traction.  

 

It all could just be lip service, but we shall see.

Message 21 of 32 (2,841 Views)
Mentor

Re: Possible Smithsonian channel move?

Why was this topic marked as solved?  The "accepted solution" is in direct contrast from the information that I received from the content provider.  More importantly, the channel hasn't changed locations as of yet.

Message 22 of 32 (2,838 Views)
ACE - Professor

Re: Possible Smithsonian channel move?


NormChar wrote:

Why was this topic marked as solved?  The "accepted solution" is in direct contrast from the information that I received from the content provider.  More importantly, the channel hasn't changed locations as of yet.


 

Posting a wish on this forum wouldn't be the best way to get a channel to move slots. I would suggest contacting the operator of the channel.

 

Maybe channels like Discovery and Smithsonian are considered more "general interest" and a lot of the other such channels are more in-depth...that might be why they're not closer to each other. When I had basic cable, I had Discovery on channel 40-something...yet, the channels that used to be known as Discovery Wings, Discovery Kids, etc, were all in the digital tier way up the list.

*The views and opinions expressed on this forum are purely my own. Any product claim, statistic, quote, or other representation about a product or service should be verified with the manufacturer, provider, or party.
Message 23 of 32 (2,810 Views)
Mentor

Re: Possible Smithsonian channel move?

Baseball,

Skip up a couple of posts.  I did contact both the Smithsonian channel and Uverse customer care.

Message 24 of 32 (2,779 Views)
ACE - Master

Re: Possible Smithsonian channel move?

[ Edited ]

NormChar wrote:

Why was this topic marked as solved?  The "accepted solution" is in direct contrast from the information that I received from the content provider.  More importantly, the channel hasn't changed locations as of yet.


IMHO the forum uses the term "solved" a bit loosely.  A better term would be "best response."  It does not always mean that the issue has been solved.  In topics where it is a technical issue, and someone provides an answer on what to do to resolve it, the solved tag is a good fit but some folks who will tell a poster that something can't happen, marking something as "solved," is a bit of a misnomer and posters do mention that it;s not solved, all the time.    I have been thinking about bringing this issue up with Forum moderators - as some folks think that "tag" means that the issue has been resolved and that rarely is, what that truly means.  

 

Hate to be a wet-blanket BUT if AT&T does move Smithsonian, I can see the posts now where folks are complaining that it is no longer on 118, why did it get moved and so on.  Good luck.

*The views and opinions expressed on this forum are purely my own. Any product claim, statistic, quote, or other representation about a product or service should be verified with the manufacturer, provider, or party.
Message 25 of 32 (2,702 Views)
ACE - Expert

Re: Possible Smithsonian channel move?

FWIW, If I had to choose between an unofficial answer from Fox Mulder and a answer given by an AT&T Support person, I'd take Fox's every time. 

 

Channel numbering is part of the negotiation process, just like tier, OnDemand, multi-screen, etc, etc.

 

The truth is out there.

*The views and opinions expressed on this forum are purely my own. Any product claim, statistic, quote, or other representation about a product or service should be verified with the manufacturer, provider, or party.
Message 26 of 32 (2,692 Views)
Mentor

Re: Possible Smithsonian channel move?


dhascall wrote:

 

Hate to be a wet-blanket BUT if AT&T does move Smithsonian, I can see the posts now where folks are complaining that it is no longer on 118, why did it get moved and so on.  Good luck.


Probably true.  There's never a way to please 100%.  But to me, if it's moved to the other block, it would be with similar content providers.  The same way they've tiered music, news, sports, movies, etc.  That would at least be a logical response as to why it was moved.  Where as the response as to why the current location seems to be "because".    

Message 27 of 32 (2,660 Views)
ACE - Master

Re: Possible Smithsonian channel move?

At one time Smithsonian was HD only.  U-Verse placed the Smithsonian channel - and other HD only channels such as HD Movies in the low 1100's.  I bet they did that tio showcase the HD content.

*The views and opinions expressed on this forum are purely my own. Any product claim, statistic, quote, or other representation about a product or service should be verified with the manufacturer, provider, or party.
Message 28 of 32 (2,619 Views)
Scholar

Re: Possible Smithsonian channel move?


dhascall wrote:

At one time Smithsonian was HD only.  U-Verse placed the Smithsonian channel - and other HD only channels such as HD Movies in the low 1100's.  I bet they did that tio showcase the HD content.


This is correct, which is why it was placed in that range, alongside HDNet (now AXS), HDNet Movies, Universal HD and HD Theater (now Velocity).  Comcast did the same in their HD infancy, in that ESPN, Discovery HD Theater, iNHD1, and iNHD2 were all grouped together -- followed by adding TNT, UniversalHD, MHD (now Palladia) and changing iNHD1 to MOJO (later to Versus HD, now NBCSN), iNHD2 to Golf Channel HD.  On most Comcast systems, after 10 years, those channels *still* occupy the same spots.

 

CBS/Showtime, the channel's owner, probably loves the placement, and would fight AT&T to move it into the "correct" tier.

 

As to the reasons for placements like Discovery Channel, A&E and others in the 100s would be more related to AT&T keeping those networks grouped in their own "basic cable" tier.  ALL of the programmers would LOVE to have a low channel placement, which is still the case even with the sports specialty networks.  For example, when the SEC Network goes live, you can believe that they will want placement on the old "sub-100" channels of the cable providers in their stomping grounds -- in the space people have come to associate with the old "basic cable" networks.

Message 29 of 32 (2,609 Views)
ACE - Master

Re: Possible Smithsonian channel move?

[ Edited ]

Someone saw a "bug" that said SEC would be 607/1607, which is a pretty darned good placement, if you ask me. 

 

As far as Smithsonian "fighting" the move, he had an email purportedly from Smithsonian that said it's AT&T's call.  You know that AT&T could have the channel in two places but I bet that would be expensive.

*The views and opinions expressed on this forum are purely my own. Any product claim, statistic, quote, or other representation about a product or service should be verified with the manufacturer, provider, or party.
Message 30 of 32 (2,605 Views)
Share this topic
Announcements

Having service trouble? There is an app for that! Use our troubleshooting tool or text myATT to 8758 to download the app. It is much faster than posting on our forums. You will also find some helpful articles below.