Ask a question
Search in U-verse Forums

U-verse Forums

Reply
Highlighted
Posted Feb 13, 2014
7:04:07 PM
View profile
Coax or Cat5

We had Uverse TV and cancelled it. Now we are considering getting Uverse TV again with one or two STB's. The coax cable, AT&T splitters and connectors are still in place. Does the installer still have the option of using existing coax or must cat5 cables now be used?

 

If I wanted the installer to run cat5 cable from the RG to an Home Theater System, how would I order that and how much would I be charged?

We had Uverse TV and cancelled it. Now we are considering getting Uverse TV again with one or two STB's. The coax cable, AT&T splitters and connectors are still in place. Does the installer still have the option of using existing coax or must cat5 cables now be used?

 

If I wanted the installer to run cat5 cable from the RG to an Home Theater System, how would I order that and how much would I be charged?

*The views and opinions expressed on this forum are purely my own. Any product claim, statistic, quote, or other representation about a product or service should be verified with the manufacturer, provider, or party.
1
(1)
  • Rate this reply
View profile
Solved
Jul 9, 2014 4:31:59 PM
1
(1)
Employee
No self install option on adding hardwired receiver.... tech service call to add equipment $99.

To save money and time.... no waiting for appointment plus any wiring time if needed.... the wireless receiver. At $49 one time fee half cost of tech visit, direct shipped means no need to waiting appointment needed. And the wireless receiver does have an ethernet port if want to hardline yourself and not use wireless access point.

win...win.
*I am an AT&T employee and the postings on this site are my own and don’t necessarily represent AT&T’s position, strategies or opinions.
Accepted Solution

Coax or Cat5

8,586 views
33 replies
(0) Me too
(0) Me too
Reply
View all replies
(33)
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
View profile
Feb 13, 2014 7:32:26 PM
0
(0)
Employee
Preferred method of install if devices are wireless, cat5 cable NID to RG, RG near main DVR location, premade Ethernet cable to DVR, if this is HTS location, another premade (6 to 15 feet) to HTS. Wireless Access Point on 6 foot Ethernet. Up to two wireless receivers.

The installer can run up to 3 lines without charge, the home run (NID to RG) counts as 1.
Each wire run over 3 is $55 per cable.

Wireless receiver is $49 each one time charge, plus $8 per month same as hardwired ($8).
If order u300 or u450 can order 1 wireless receiver without $49 one time charge.

While existing coax can be used, the recommendation is not to.
Preferred method of install if devices are wireless, cat5 cable NID to RG, RG near main DVR location, premade Ethernet cable to DVR, if this is HTS location, another premade (6 to 15 feet) to HTS. Wireless Access Point on 6 foot Ethernet. Up to two wireless receivers.

The installer can run up to 3 lines without charge, the home run (NID to RG) counts as 1.
Each wire run over 3 is $55 per cable.

Wireless receiver is $49 each one time charge, plus $8 per month same as hardwired ($8).
If order u300 or u450 can order 1 wireless receiver without $49 one time charge.

While existing coax can be used, the recommendation is not to.
*I am an AT&T employee and the postings on this site are my own and don’t necessarily represent AT&T’s position, strategies or opinions.

Re: Coax or Cat5

2 of 34 (8,557 Views)
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
View profile
Feb 14, 2014 3:38:54 AM
0
(0)
ACE - Guru
I would want everything wired. If we do get TV again I will tell the tech to use cat5 instead if coax. There would be two wires run. We already have cat5 from the inid to the existing RG (i38hg).
I would want everything wired. If we do get TV again I will tell the tech to use cat5 instead if coax. There would be two wires run. We already have cat5 from the inid to the existing RG (i38hg).
*The views and opinions expressed on this forum are purely my own. Any product claim, statistic, quote, or other representation about a product or service should be verified with the manufacturer, provider, or party.

Re: Coax or Cat5

3 of 34 (8,528 Views)
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
View profile
Feb 22, 2014 2:57:49 PM
0
(0)
ACE - Guru
If we do have an ethernet cable run to the Home theater, can someone recommend a switch(?) to use to connect three devices? I would assume the cable from the router into the switch and three ethernet cables out to the devices. For future proofing, a 6-8 port switch would work too. Would the tech have one in the truck that could be bought and used?
If we do have an ethernet cable run to the Home theater, can someone recommend a switch(?) to use to connect three devices? I would assume the cable from the router into the switch and three ethernet cables out to the devices. For future proofing, a 6-8 port switch would work too. Would the tech have one in the truck that could be bought and used?
*The views and opinions expressed on this forum are purely my own. Any product claim, statistic, quote, or other representation about a product or service should be verified with the manufacturer, provider, or party.

Re: Coax or Cat5

4 of 34 (8,472 Views)
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
View profile
Feb 22, 2014 3:16:14 PM
0
(0)
ACE - Expert
browndk26 - I use one of these 108 switches that I believe had been recommended in posts. THere do seem to be variations of the letter designation. Not sure how much difference it makes.

http://www.amazon.com/dp/B00006RVPW/ref=asc_df_B00006RVPW1644937?smid=ATVPDKIKX0DER&tag=hyprod-20&li...

One thing that does make a difference is - keep a path to the RG for video and one for internet access. If you mix video and internet on the same path/switch it may flood the switch. This forces at least two cat5 cable from the location to the RG. Then you have to decide if you want more cables, one or two switches.
browndk26 - I use one of these 108 switches that I believe had been recommended in posts. THere do seem to be variations of the letter designation. Not sure how much difference it makes.

http://www.amazon.com/dp/B00006RVPW/ref=asc_df_B00006RVPW1644937?smid=ATVPDKIKX0DER&tag=hyprod-20&linkCode=asn&creative=395093&creativeASIN=B00006RVPW

One thing that does make a difference is - keep a path to the RG for video and one for internet access. If you mix video and internet on the same path/switch it may flood the switch. This forces at least two cat5 cable from the location to the RG. Then you have to decide if you want more cables, one or two switches.
*The views and opinions expressed on this forum are purely my own. Any product claim, statistic, quote, or other representation about a product or service should be verified with the manufacturer, provider, or party.

Re: Coax or Cat5

5 of 34 (8,472 Views)
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
View profile
Feb 22, 2014 3:27:32 PM
0
(0)
ACE - Guru
Thanks aviewer. I will have them run two cables to the Home theater. With the above switch, does the cable from the router plug into any of the 8 ports pictured? There is no "in" port and "out" ports?
Thanks aviewer. I will have them run two cables to the Home theater. With the above switch, does the cable from the router plug into any of the 8 ports pictured? There is no "in" port and "out" ports?
*The views and opinions expressed on this forum are purely my own. Any product claim, statistic, quote, or other representation about a product or service should be verified with the manufacturer, provider, or party.

Re: Coax or Cat5

6 of 34 (8,469 Views)
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
View profile
Feb 22, 2014 3:49:50 PM
0
(0)
ACE - Expert
browndk26 - Now that you mention it, I think that confused me too. The directions must have covered it.
browndk26 - Now that you mention it, I think that confused me too. The directions must have covered it.
*The views and opinions expressed on this forum are purely my own. Any product claim, statistic, quote, or other representation about a product or service should be verified with the manufacturer, provider, or party.

Re: Coax or Cat5

7 of 34 (8,462 Views)
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
View profile
Feb 26, 2014 6:50:24 PM
0
(0)
Guru

browndk26 wrote:
Thanks aviewer. I will have them run two cables to the Home theater. With the above switch, does the cable from the router plug into any of the 8 ports pictured? There is no "in" port and "out" ports?

Yes. It's auto-uplink enabled, so it will detect which one of the ports is providing uplink data. (Out of habit, I always do port 1 or 8.)


browndk26 wrote:
Thanks aviewer. I will have them run two cables to the Home theater. With the above switch, does the cable from the router plug into any of the 8 ports pictured? There is no "in" port and "out" ports?

Yes. It's auto-uplink enabled, so it will detect which one of the ports is providing uplink data. (Out of habit, I always do port 1 or 8.)

Re: Coax or Cat5

8 of 34 (8,425 Views)
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
View profile
Mar 7, 2014 12:21:07 PM
0
(0)
ACE - Guru
I have read in some of the forums that inid installations are not being done anymore. If we added TV services again, would our inid be removed and would we be given another router? Or would we keep all the same equipment? We currently have the 2wire i38hg RG and a nid and inid on the outside of the house. Cat5 home run from the inid to the RG.
I have read in some of the forums that inid installations are not being done anymore. If we added TV services again, would our inid be removed and would we be given another router? Or would we keep all the same equipment? We currently have the 2wire i38hg RG and a nid and inid on the outside of the house. Cat5 home run from the inid to the RG.
*The views and opinions expressed on this forum are purely my own. Any product claim, statistic, quote, or other representation about a product or service should be verified with the manufacturer, provider, or party.

Re: Coax or Cat5

9 of 34 (8,372 Views)
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
View profile
Mar 7, 2014 12:34:13 PM
0
(0)
ACE - Expert

If you were a new customer, you would not get an iNID.  You would have a Cat5e home run installed between your NID and your RG, and both pair would run from the VRAD, through your NID, to a Motorola NVG 589 RG which would handle the pair bonded VDSL2 connection.

 

If there isn't a problem with your current equipment, I don't know that they would want to replace stuff that's working.

 

It's a good question.  I hope my thoughts wanders through and can give a more informed, but still personal, opinion on this.

 

If you were a new customer, you would not get an iNID.  You would have a Cat5e home run installed between your NID and your RG, and both pair would run from the VRAD, through your NID, to a Motorola NVG 589 RG which would handle the pair bonded VDSL2 connection.

 

If there isn't a problem with your current equipment, I don't know that they would want to replace stuff that's working.

 

It's a good question.  I hope my thoughts wanders through and can give a more informed, but still personal, opinion on this.

 

*The views and opinions expressed on this forum are purely my own. Any product claim, statistic, quote, or other representation about a product or service should be verified with the manufacturer, provider, or party.

Re: Coax or Cat5

10 of 34 (8,369 Views)
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
View profile
Mar 7, 2014 7:22:43 PM
0
(0)
Employee
Replace a working inid when adding TV service?
More of a tech choice... inid are just original bonded installs, still carried on trucks, I have installed 2 past 90 days.
Techs carry limited equipment, generally 2 of each RG, 3800, 3801, 589, 5031, 510, and (1) 3812, with PS, i38hg.
If tech has no 589s, or has only one which fails to load software, installing inid.

My 1900 foot install today was a 3801, devices couldn't connect to wifi pass code,swapped for other 3801....next job was a frequent 3800 repair with weak wifi...required to replace 3800 with 3801 on frequent, no more 3801 , installed 589.

Newer techs not familiar would remove inid, power supply, and i38hg. Install new nid,possible new cat5 home run if RG in different location than current i38hg indoor unit (IU). Experienced techs looking to save time would test equipment and use if no problems.

The only advantage is 589 having low frequency (2.4 ghz) n wireless.
Either unit can have problems after install, seen 589 with flaky wifi signal within 30 days, ports fail, etc. So having newest equipment does not necessary mean problem free.

As the work order generally states RG to use, I would say odds about 65% new RG, but could just be inid replacement with another 3812 inid.

When in doubt ask installer....
Replace a working inid when adding TV service?
More of a tech choice... inid are just original bonded installs, still carried on trucks, I have installed 2 past 90 days.
Techs carry limited equipment, generally 2 of each RG, 3800, 3801, 589, 5031, 510, and (1) 3812, with PS, i38hg.
If tech has no 589s, or has only one which fails to load software, installing inid.

My 1900 foot install today was a 3801, devices couldn't connect to wifi pass code,swapped for other 3801....next job was a frequent 3800 repair with weak wifi...required to replace 3800 with 3801 on frequent, no more 3801 , installed 589.

Newer techs not familiar would remove inid, power supply, and i38hg. Install new nid,possible new cat5 home run if RG in different location than current i38hg indoor unit (IU). Experienced techs looking to save time would test equipment and use if no problems.

The only advantage is 589 having low frequency (2.4 ghz) n wireless.
Either unit can have problems after install, seen 589 with flaky wifi signal within 30 days, ports fail, etc. So having newest equipment does not necessary mean problem free.

As the work order generally states RG to use, I would say odds about 65% new RG, but could just be inid replacement with another 3812 inid.

When in doubt ask installer....
*I am an AT&T employee and the postings on this site are my own and don’t necessarily represent AT&T’s position, strategies or opinions.

Re: Coax or Cat5

11 of 34 (8,340 Views)
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
View profile
Mar 8, 2014 5:51:18 AM
0
(0)
ACE - Guru
Thanks for the responses. "If it is not broken, don't fix it" seems appropriate here.
Thanks for the responses. "If it is not broken, don't fix it" seems appropriate here.
*The views and opinions expressed on this forum are purely my own. Any product claim, statistic, quote, or other representation about a product or service should be verified with the manufacturer, provider, or party.

Re: Coax or Cat5

12 of 34 (8,315 Views)
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
View profile
May 13, 2014 5:31:28 PM
0
(0)
ACE - Guru

My Thoughts,

 

Can a cat 5 cable be run to a TV without an STB? To connect an internet device such as an Apple TV or Home Theater Receiver?

My Thoughts,

 

Can a cat 5 cable be run to a TV without an STB? To connect an internet device such as an Apple TV or Home Theater Receiver?

*The views and opinions expressed on this forum are purely my own. Any product claim, statistic, quote, or other representation about a product or service should be verified with the manufacturer, provider, or party.

Re: Coax or Cat5

13 of 34 (8,227 Views)
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
View profile
May 13, 2014 7:00:28 PM
0
(0)
Employee
In short, yes. (Standard Ethernet)

Need either a free port (yellow) on back if RG or to a gigabit switch such as GS108 if need expanded ports at RG.

http://www.att.com/equipment/accessory-details/?q_sku=sku3950269
In short, yes. (Standard Ethernet)

Need either a free port (yellow) on back if RG or to a gigabit switch such as GS108 if need expanded ports at RG.

http://www.att.com/equipment/accessory-details/?q_sku=sku3950269
*I am an AT&T employee and the postings on this site are my own and don’t necessarily represent AT&T’s position, strategies or opinions.

Re: Coax or Cat5

14 of 34 (8,214 Views)
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
View profile
May 15, 2014 1:48:06 PM
0
(0)
ACE - Guru
 
*The views and opinions expressed on this forum are purely my own. Any product claim, statistic, quote, or other representation about a product or service should be verified with the manufacturer, provider, or party.

Re: Coax or Cat5

15 of 34 (8,190 Views)
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
View profile
May 15, 2014 1:50:58 PM
0
(0)
ACE - Guru
Edited by browndk26 on May 15, 2014 at 1:58:44 PM

We have u200 TV service scheduled to install tomorrow 05/16/14. I will post back how the install goes and if the existing INID and RG are replaced or kept. I am going to ask for one cat5 cable to the family room tv and 2 to the basement TV.

We have u200 TV service scheduled to install tomorrow 05/16/14. I will post back how the install goes and if the existing INID and RG are replaced or kept. I am going to ask for one cat5 cable to the family room tv and 2 to the basement TV.

*The views and opinions expressed on this forum are purely my own. Any product claim, statistic, quote, or other representation about a product or service should be verified with the manufacturer, provider, or party.

Re: Coax or Cat5

[ Edited ]
16 of 34 (8,188 Views)
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
View profile
May 16, 2014 8:25:48 AM
0
(0)
ACE - Guru
Edited by browndk26 on May 16, 2014 at 9:33:50 AM

Install took about 1 1/2 hours. The tech left the existing INID AND RG(i38hg). Ran cat 5 cable to the TV. He didn't want to run the extra cat 5 cable to the home theater so I didn't push that. The dvr is tiny and responds much quicker to the remote than the DVR/STB's we had before. The dvr is an IPH8005. I don't know what capacity hard drive it is. The tech said it has a replaceable hard drive.

Install took about 1 1/2 hours. The tech left the existing INID AND RG(i38hg). Ran cat 5 cable to the TV. He didn't want to run the extra cat 5 cable to the home theater so I didn't push that. The dvr is tiny and responds much quicker to the remote than the DVR/STB's we had before. The dvr is an IPH8005. I don't know what capacity hard drive it is. The tech said it has a replaceable hard drive.

*The views and opinions expressed on this forum are purely my own. Any product claim, statistic, quote, or other representation about a product or service should be verified with the manufacturer, provider, or party.

Re: Coax or Cat5

[ Edited ]
17 of 34 (8,152 Views)
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
View profile
May 16, 2014 9:11:00 AM
0
(0)
ACE - Expert

browndk26 wrote:
Install took about 1 1/2 hours. The tech left the existing INID AND RG(i38hg). Ran cat 5 cable to the TV. He didn't want to run the extra cat 5 cable to the home theater so I didn't push that. The dvr is tiny and responds much quicker to the remote than the DVR/STB's we had before. The dvr is an IPH8005. I don't know what capacity hard drive it is. The tech said it has a replaceable hard drive.

Replaceable in the refurbishment center, maybe.  Why do techs say stuff like this?

 


browndk26 wrote:
Install took about 1 1/2 hours. The tech left the existing INID AND RG(i38hg). Ran cat 5 cable to the TV. He didn't want to run the extra cat 5 cable to the home theater so I didn't push that. The dvr is tiny and responds much quicker to the remote than the DVR/STB's we had before. The dvr is an IPH8005. I don't know what capacity hard drive it is. The tech said it has a replaceable hard drive.

Replaceable in the refurbishment center, maybe.  Why do techs say stuff like this?

 

*The views and opinions expressed on this forum are purely my own. Any product claim, statistic, quote, or other representation about a product or service should be verified with the manufacturer, provider, or party.

Re: Coax or Cat5

18 of 34 (8,146 Views)
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
View profile
May 16, 2014 10:17:29 AM
0
(0)
ACE - Expert
JefferMC - That caught my eye, too. I googled it & the Pace web site does tout it as a feature -

DVR functions are supported utilizing a 500GB, 2.5” field-removable hard drive. By allowing for quick technician removal of the hard disk, operators can reduce service costs and simplify logistics when servicing customer returns. In addition, the IPH8005 offers quiet operation and a low-temperature, fanless design.

http://www.pace.com/americas/products/set-top-box/iptv/iph8005/
JefferMC - That caught my eye, too. I googled it & the Pace web site does tout it as a feature -

DVR functions are supported utilizing a 500GB, 2.5” field-removable hard drive. By allowing for quick technician removal of the hard disk, operators can reduce service costs and simplify logistics when servicing customer returns. In addition, the IPH8005 offers quiet operation and a low-temperature, fanless design.

http://www.pace.com/americas/products/set-top-box/iptv/iph8005/
*The views and opinions expressed on this forum are purely my own. Any product claim, statistic, quote, or other representation about a product or service should be verified with the manufacturer, provider, or party.

Re: Coax or Cat5

19 of 34 (8,137 Views)
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
View profile
May 16, 2014 11:30:00 AM
0
(0)
ACE - Expert

aviewer wrote:
JefferMC - That caught my eye, too. I googled it & the Pace web site does tout it as a feature -

DVR functions are supported utilizing a 500GB, 2.5” field-removable hard drive. By allowing for quick technician removal of the hard disk, operators can reduce service costs and simplify logistics when servicing customer returns. In addition, the IPH8005 offers quiet operation and a low-temperature, fanless design.

http://www.pace.com/americas/products/set-top-box/iptv/iph8005/

"when servicing customer returns" i.e. during testing/refurbishment.  "Field-removeable" meaning in the operator's facility as opposed to PACE's.

 


aviewer wrote:
JefferMC - That caught my eye, too. I googled it & the Pace web site does tout it as a feature -

DVR functions are supported utilizing a 500GB, 2.5” field-removable hard drive. By allowing for quick technician removal of the hard disk, operators can reduce service costs and simplify logistics when servicing customer returns. In addition, the IPH8005 offers quiet operation and a low-temperature, fanless design.

http://www.pace.com/americas/products/set-top-box/iptv/iph8005/

"when servicing customer returns" i.e. during testing/refurbishment.  "Field-removeable" meaning in the operator's facility as opposed to PACE's.

 

*The views and opinions expressed on this forum are purely my own. Any product claim, statistic, quote, or other representation about a product or service should be verified with the manufacturer, provider, or party.

Re: Coax or Cat5

20 of 34 (8,131 Views)
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
View profile
May 29, 2014 3:14:56 PM
0
(0)
ACE - Guru
If I wanted to move the STB to another TV, do I just plug it into an Ethernet cable connected to the RG and power up the STB? I may want to occasionally watch recorded shows on the basement TV with surround sound.
If I wanted to move the STB to another TV, do I just plug it into an Ethernet cable connected to the RG and power up the STB? I may want to occasionally watch recorded shows on the basement TV with surround sound.
*The views and opinions expressed on this forum are purely my own. Any product claim, statistic, quote, or other representation about a product or service should be verified with the manufacturer, provider, or party.

Re: Coax or Cat5

21 of 34 (8,058 Views)
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
View profile
May 29, 2014 4:43:15 PM
0
(0)
Employee
If you have only one tv receiver. ..the DVR... yes may relocate. If have multiple receivers would encourage acquiring a wireless receiver to move from lication to location. The wireless receiver has a one time fee of $49 includes a Wireless Access Point..need a free port on back of RG...and is $8 per month. Swapping an existing hardwired receiver for wireless may even allow for reducing number of needed receivers saving money.
If you have only one tv receiver. ..the DVR... yes may relocate. If have multiple receivers would encourage acquiring a wireless receiver to move from lication to location. The wireless receiver has a one time fee of $49 includes a Wireless Access Point..need a free port on back of RG...and is $8 per month. Swapping an existing hardwired receiver for wireless may even allow for reducing number of needed receivers saving money.
*I am an AT&T employee and the postings on this site are my own and don’t necessarily represent AT&T’s position, strategies or opinions.

Re: Coax or Cat5

22 of 34 (8,048 Views)
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
View profile
May 29, 2014 4:57:57 PM
0
(0)
ACE - Guru
Thanks. We have the DVR only. No plans to get another receiver. I would get a wired one if we did.
Thanks. We have the DVR only. No plans to get another receiver. I would get a wired one if we did.
*The views and opinions expressed on this forum are purely my own. Any product claim, statistic, quote, or other representation about a product or service should be verified with the manufacturer, provider, or party.

Re: Coax or Cat5

23 of 34 (8,046 Views)
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
View profile
Jul 9, 2014 3:10:11 PM
0
(0)
ACE - Guru

How much would it cost to add a wired receiver to our existing Service? U200 tv with 1 DVR. I38HG RG. Current DVR is connected by ATT installed ethernet cable.

 

 If a tech came would I be charged for a tech vist of $99 and $54 wire charge to extend an existing ethernet cable run to the TV? Is there an activation fee for the additional receiver? If I extended the ethernet cable myself, can a receiver be shipped to me and I connect it myself? Still an activation fee if I can connect it myself?

How much would it cost to add a wired receiver to our existing Service? U200 tv with 1 DVR. I38HG RG. Current DVR is connected by ATT installed ethernet cable.

 

 If a tech came would I be charged for a tech vist of $99 and $54 wire charge to extend an existing ethernet cable run to the TV? Is there an activation fee for the additional receiver? If I extended the ethernet cable myself, can a receiver be shipped to me and I connect it myself? Still an activation fee if I can connect it myself?

*The views and opinions expressed on this forum are purely my own. Any product claim, statistic, quote, or other representation about a product or service should be verified with the manufacturer, provider, or party.

Re: Coax or Cat5

24 of 34 (7,786 Views)
1
(1)
  • Rate this reply
View profile
Solved
Jul 9, 2014 4:31:59 PM
1
(1)
Employee
No self install option on adding hardwired receiver.... tech service call to add equipment $99.

To save money and time.... no waiting for appointment plus any wiring time if needed.... the wireless receiver. At $49 one time fee half cost of tech visit, direct shipped means no need to waiting appointment needed. And the wireless receiver does have an ethernet port if want to hardline yourself and not use wireless access point.

win...win.
No self install option on adding hardwired receiver.... tech service call to add equipment $99.

To save money and time.... no waiting for appointment plus any wiring time if needed.... the wireless receiver. At $49 one time fee half cost of tech visit, direct shipped means no need to waiting appointment needed. And the wireless receiver does have an ethernet port if want to hardline yourself and not use wireless access point.

win...win.
*I am an AT&T employee and the postings on this site are my own and don’t necessarily represent AT&T’s position, strategies or opinions.

Re: Coax or Cat5

25 of 34 (7,778 Views)
Solution
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
View profile
Jul 9, 2014 4:38:08 PM
0
(0)
ACE - Guru

my thoughts wrote:
No self install option on adding hardwired receiver.... tech service call to add equipment $99.

To save money and time.... no waiting for appointment plus any wiring time if needed.... the wireless receiver. At $49 one time fee half cost of tech visit, direct shipped means no need to waiting appointment needed. And the wireless receiver does have an ethernet port if want to hardline yourself and not use wireless access point.

win...win.
Thanks my thoughts. I hadn't thought about wiring the wireless receiver. Do I still pay a monthly fee for the wireless receiver after the $49 one time fee?

 


my thoughts wrote:
No self install option on adding hardwired receiver.... tech service call to add equipment $99.

To save money and time.... no waiting for appointment plus any wiring time if needed.... the wireless receiver. At $49 one time fee half cost of tech visit, direct shipped means no need to waiting appointment needed. And the wireless receiver does have an ethernet port if want to hardline yourself and not use wireless access point.

win...win.
Thanks my thoughts. I hadn't thought about wiring the wireless receiver. Do I still pay a monthly fee for the wireless receiver after the $49 one time fee?

 

*The views and opinions expressed on this forum are purely my own. Any product claim, statistic, quote, or other representation about a product or service should be verified with the manufacturer, provider, or party.

Re: Coax or Cat5

26 of 34 (7,776 Views)
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
View profile
Jul 13, 2014 7:46:00 PM
0
(0)
ACE - Expert

Yes, it's still an additional receiver. Smiley Wink

 

Chris

__________________________________________

Please NO SD stretch-o-vision or 480 SD HD Channels
Need Help? PM ATT Uverse Care (all service problems)
or ATT Customer Care (all other problems)

Your Results May Vary, In My Humble Opinion
I Call It Like I See It, Simply a U-verse user, nothing more

Yes, it's still an additional receiver. Smiley Wink

 

Chris

__________________________________________

Please NO SD stretch-o-vision or 480 SD HD Channels
Need Help? PM ATT Uverse Care (all service problems)
or ATT Customer Care (all other problems)

Your Results May Vary, In My Humble Opinion
I Call It Like I See It, Simply a U-verse user, nothing more

*The views and opinions expressed on this forum are purely my own. Any product claim, statistic, quote, or other representation about a product or service should be verified with the manufacturer, provider, or party.

Re: Coax or Cat5

27 of 34 (7,708 Views)
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
View profile
Aug 1, 2014 7:44:33 PM
0
(0)
ACE - Guru
Is it ok to leave an Ethernet cable that is not connected to a device plugged into the RG? I would presume no signal would be going into that unconnected cable.
Is it ok to leave an Ethernet cable that is not connected to a device plugged into the RG? I would presume no signal would be going into that unconnected cable.
*The views and opinions expressed on this forum are purely my own. Any product claim, statistic, quote, or other representation about a product or service should be verified with the manufacturer, provider, or party.

Is it ok to leave an Ethernet cable that is not connected...

28 of 34 (7,335 Views)
4
(1)
  • Rate this reply
View profile
Aug 1, 2014 7:58:11 PM
4
(1)
ACE - Expert

Ethernet: yes, it's okay.

 

 

Ethernet: yes, it's okay.

 

 

*The views and opinions expressed on this forum are purely my own. Any product claim, statistic, quote, or other representation about a product or service should be verified with the manufacturer, provider, or party.

Re: Is it ok to leave an Ethernet cable that is not connected...

29 of 34 (7,332 Views)
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
View profile
Aug 5, 2014 3:55:21 PM
0
(0)
ACE - Guru

Thanks.

 

Another question. I am going to extend the existing ethernet cable (that is connected to the RG) by using a coupler between two ethernet cables to connect to an apple TV. Will any cat 5 cable  be ok to use? Any specs I should look for?

 

 

Thanks.

 

Another question. I am going to extend the existing ethernet cable (that is connected to the RG) by using a coupler between two ethernet cables to connect to an apple TV. Will any cat 5 cable  be ok to use? Any specs I should look for?

 

 

*The views and opinions expressed on this forum are purely my own. Any product claim, statistic, quote, or other representation about a product or service should be verified with the manufacturer, provider, or party.

Re: Is it ok to leave an Ethernet cable that is not connected...

30 of 34 (7,141 Views)
Share this post
Share this post