Wireless Forums

Reply
Posted Jul 15, 2010
10:55:59 PM
texting limits need to be more specific
Edited by buddha2go on Jul 15, 2010 at 11:17:13 PM

Dear AT&T Gods,

 

Please create a separate blocking rate for INTERNATIONAL ROAMING (Global 50 plan) and LOCAL USE (unlimited nationwide).

 

We should be able to restrict use of the international texting (International 100 plan) and roaming texting (Global 50) to a total overage number or dollar amount per month, and still have the option to allow unlimited local nationwide use.

 

In other words, please help us keep the overages down, without restricting (and thus, nullifying) paid-for Unlimited Plan use by counting it toward the pre-set total number of texts allowed under parental controls.

 

Thank you.

Dear AT&T Gods,

 

Please create a separate blocking rate for INTERNATIONAL ROAMING (Global 50 plan) and LOCAL USE (unlimited nationwide).

 

We should be able to restrict use of the international texting (International 100 plan) and roaming texting (Global 50) to a total overage number or dollar amount per month, and still have the option to allow unlimited local nationwide use.

 

In other words, please help us keep the overages down, without restricting (and thus, nullifying) paid-for Unlimited Plan use by counting it toward the pre-set total number of texts allowed under parental controls.

 

Thank you.

texting limits need to be more specific

[ Edited ]
1,790 views
6 replies
(0) Me too
(0) Me too
Post reply
Replies
(6)
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
View profile
Jul 18, 2010 2:45:27 PM
0
(0)
Scholar

unfortunately no one from att read these boards

 


I am an AT&T employee and the postings on this site are my own and don’t necessarily represent AT&T’s positions, strategies or opinions.

unfortunately no one from att read these boards

Re: texting limits need to be more specific

2 of 7 (1,755 Views)
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
View profile
Jul 18, 2010 10:10:02 PM
0
(0)
Mentor

 


rosa.limones wrote:

unfortunately no one from att read these boards


 

that's why i had the foresight to address it to the GODS.

 

LOL

 


rosa.limones wrote:

unfortunately no one from att read these boards


 

that's why i had the foresight to address it to the GODS.

 

LOL

Re: texting limits need to be more specific

3 of 7 (1,744 Views)
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
View profile
Jul 19, 2010 9:05:46 AM
0
(0)
Scholar

xD!!!!!

 


I am an AT&T employee and the postings on this site are my own and don’t necessarily represent AT&T’s positions, strategies or opinions.

xD!!!!!

Re: texting limits need to be more specific

4 of 7 (1,734 Views)
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
View profile
Jul 19, 2010 7:01:36 PM
0
(0)
ACE - Master

There are AT&T Gods...?

 

No one told me THIS... :smileywink:

 

:cathappy: Remember that Wild Banchi... 1993-2010 :cathappy:



There are AT&T Gods...?

 

No one told me THIS... :smileywink:

 

:cathappy: Remember that Wild Banchi... 1993-2010 :cathappy:



Remember that Wild Banchi... 1993-2010
*The views and opinions expressed on this forum are purely my own. Any product claim, statistic, quote, or other representation about a product or service should be verified with the manufacturer, provider, or party.

Re: texting limits need to be more specific

5 of 7 (1,723 Views)
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
View profile
Jul 27, 2010 6:03:47 AM
0
(0)
Mentor

well, you gotta B-E-L-I-E-V-E !!!  :smileyvery-happy:

well, you gotta B-E-L-I-E-V-E !!!  :smileyvery-happy:

Re: texting limits need to be more specific

6 of 7 (1,597 Views)
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
View profile
Jul 27, 2010 7:12:35 PM
0
(0)
Professor
It's a reasonable request, especially now-a-days when some numbers from certain countries don't even need a country code to be called from the US.
It's a reasonable request, especially now-a-days when some numbers from certain countries don't even need a country code to be called from the US.

Re: texting limits need to be more specific

7 of 7 (1,575 Views)
Share this post
Share this post