Ask a question
Search in U-verse Forums

U-verse Forums

Reply
Highlighted
Posted Aug 20, 2014
7:55:28 PM
View profile
Why no CBS?

I searched and found a thread that was 2 years old and disintegrated into a Big Brother discussion.

 

But it's 2 years later and AT&T has still not managed to get locally owned CBS stations on board (and ondemand)? 

 

Whether you read this and watch or don't watch CBS is not the matter here. I do watch it. A lot of it. And it is the highest rated broadcast station. Why has nothing been done about securing this programming? 

 

p.s.

the options to select Topic were very minimal. none of them really fit my question, so I just clicked one. feel free to move my thread as needed.

I searched and found a thread that was 2 years old and disintegrated into a Big Brother discussion.

 

But it's 2 years later and AT&T has still not managed to get locally owned CBS stations on board (and ondemand)? 

 

Whether you read this and watch or don't watch CBS is not the matter here. I do watch it. A lot of it. And it is the highest rated broadcast station. Why has nothing been done about securing this programming? 

 

p.s.

the options to select Topic were very minimal. none of them really fit my question, so I just clicked one. feel free to move my thread as needed.

Accepted Solution

Why no CBS?

2,413 views
6 replies
(0) Me too
(0) Me too
Reply
View all replies
(6)
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
View profile
Solved
Aug 20, 2014 8:13:38 PM
0
(0)
Expert

On U-verse CBS On Demand is available in markets where the local CBS affilaite is owned and operated by CBS.  CBS on Demand is available here in the Dallas market.

On U-verse CBS On Demand is available in markets where the local CBS affilaite is owned and operated by CBS.  CBS on Demand is available here in the Dallas market.

Re: Why no CBS?

2 of 7 (2,402 Views)
Solution
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
View profile
Aug 20, 2014 9:04:35 PM
0
(0)
Contributor

That means your local CBS station is owned by the CBS network. Here in SW Missouri, our CBS station in locally owned, Texasguy34

That means your local CBS station is owned by the CBS network. Here in SW Missouri, our CBS station in locally owned, Texasguy34

Re: Why no CBS?

3 of 7 (2,392 Views)
4
(1)
  • Rate this reply
View profile
Solved
Aug 21, 2014 1:00:14 AM
4
(1)
ACE - Expert

CBS O&O Markets

Baltimore: WJZ-TV (channel 13)
Boston: WBZ-TV (channel 4)
Chicago: WBBM-TV (channel 2)
Detroit: WWJ-TV (channel 62)
Denver: KCNC-TV (channel 4)
Fort Worth: KTVT (channel 11)
Los Angeles: KCBS-TV (channel 2)
Miami: WFOR-TV (channel 4)
Minneapolis: WCCO-TV (channel 4)
New York City: WCBS-TV (channel 2)
Philadelphia: KYW-TV (channel 3)
Pittsburgh: KDKA-TV (channel 2)
San Francisco: KPIX (channel 5)
Stockton, California: KOVR (channel 13)

 

That's the agreement ATT got w/CBS.  Originally some other areas here in MI had CBS VOD, but it changed when ATT realized it got it wrong. Smiley Wink

 

Chris

__________________________________________________

Please NO SD stretch-o-vision or 480 SD HD Channels
Need Help? PM ATT Uverse Care (all service problems)
or ATT Customer Care (all other problems)

Your Results May Vary, In My Humble Opinion
I Call It Like I See It, Simply a U-verse user, nothing more

CBS O&O Markets

Baltimore: WJZ-TV (channel 13)
Boston: WBZ-TV (channel 4)
Chicago: WBBM-TV (channel 2)
Detroit: WWJ-TV (channel 62)
Denver: KCNC-TV (channel 4)
Fort Worth: KTVT (channel 11)
Los Angeles: KCBS-TV (channel 2)
Miami: WFOR-TV (channel 4)
Minneapolis: WCCO-TV (channel 4)
New York City: WCBS-TV (channel 2)
Philadelphia: KYW-TV (channel 3)
Pittsburgh: KDKA-TV (channel 2)
San Francisco: KPIX (channel 5)
Stockton, California: KOVR (channel 13)

 

That's the agreement ATT got w/CBS.  Originally some other areas here in MI had CBS VOD, but it changed when ATT realized it got it wrong. Smiley Wink

 

Chris

__________________________________________________

Please NO SD stretch-o-vision or 480 SD HD Channels
Need Help? PM ATT Uverse Care (all service problems)
or ATT Customer Care (all other problems)

Your Results May Vary, In My Humble Opinion
I Call It Like I See It, Simply a U-verse user, nothing more

*The views and opinions expressed on this forum are purely my own. Any product claim, statistic, quote, or other representation about a product or service should be verified with the manufacturer, provider, or party.

Re: Why no CBS?

4 of 7 (2,369 Views)
Solution
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
View profile
Aug 22, 2014 8:05:16 PM
0
(0)
ACE - Professor

99% of the time, when these contracts are up for renewal, things usually get improved or added onto.

 

The notable exception is the Hallmark Channel and Hallmark Movie Channel which were pulled years ago when Hallmark's ownership wanted substantially higher prices which AT&T refused to pay.

 

Maybe when the contract with Viacom and AT&T is up for renewal, things will improve. One can only hope.

99% of the time, when these contracts are up for renewal, things usually get improved or added onto.

 

The notable exception is the Hallmark Channel and Hallmark Movie Channel which were pulled years ago when Hallmark's ownership wanted substantially higher prices which AT&T refused to pay.

 

Maybe when the contract with Viacom and AT&T is up for renewal, things will improve. One can only hope.

*The views and opinions expressed on this forum are purely my own. Any product claim, statistic, quote, or other representation about a product or service should be verified with the manufacturer, provider, or party.

Re: Why no CBS?

5 of 7 (2,284 Views)
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
View profile
Aug 23, 2014 12:57:44 AM
0
(0)
ACE - Expert

baseballisback wrote:

99% of the time, when these contracts are up for renewal, things usually get improved or added onto.

 

The notable exception is the Hallmark Channel and Hallmark Movie Channel which were pulled years ago when Hallmark's ownership wanted substantially higher prices which AT&T refused to pay.

 

Maybe when the contract with Viacom and AT&T is up for renewal, things will improve. One can only hope.


They don't have a contract w/Viacom, just the individual stations in each market, AFAIK. Smiley Wink

 

Chris

______________________________________________________

Please NO SD stretch-o-vision or 480 SD HD Channels
Need Help? PM ATT Uverse Care (all service problems)
or ATT Customer Care (all other problems)

Your Results May Vary, In My Humble Opinion
I Call It Like I See It, Simply a U-verse user, nothing more


baseballisback wrote:

99% of the time, when these contracts are up for renewal, things usually get improved or added onto.

 

The notable exception is the Hallmark Channel and Hallmark Movie Channel which were pulled years ago when Hallmark's ownership wanted substantially higher prices which AT&T refused to pay.

 

Maybe when the contract with Viacom and AT&T is up for renewal, things will improve. One can only hope.


They don't have a contract w/Viacom, just the individual stations in each market, AFAIK. Smiley Wink

 

Chris

______________________________________________________

Please NO SD stretch-o-vision or 480 SD HD Channels
Need Help? PM ATT Uverse Care (all service problems)
or ATT Customer Care (all other problems)

Your Results May Vary, In My Humble Opinion
I Call It Like I See It, Simply a U-verse user, nothing more

*The views and opinions expressed on this forum are purely my own. Any product claim, statistic, quote, or other representation about a product or service should be verified with the manufacturer, provider, or party.

Re: Why no CBS?

6 of 7 (2,257 Views)
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
View profile
Aug 23, 2014 6:15:44 AM
0
(0)
ACE - Professor

mibrnsurg wrote:



They don't have a contract w/Viacom, just the individual stations in each market, AFAIK. Smiley Wink

 

Chris

______________________________________________________

Please NO SD stretch-o-vision or 480 SD HD Channels
Need Help? PM ATT Uverse Care (all service problems)
or ATT Customer Care (all other problems)

Your Results May Vary, In My Humble Opinion
I Call It Like I See It, Simply a U-verse user, nothing more


Well, both, but neither matter here. It has a contract with Viacom, who is the owner of MTV, VH1, BET, etc.Viacom hasn't been affiliated with CBS for some time now.  It also has contracts with the local CBS affiliates. 

 

CBS OnDemand, though, would be controlled by AT&T's contract with CBS, owner of CBS OTA programming, TVGN,  Showtime, etc. 


mibrnsurg wrote:



They don't have a contract w/Viacom, just the individual stations in each market, AFAIK. Smiley Wink

 

Chris

______________________________________________________

Please NO SD stretch-o-vision or 480 SD HD Channels
Need Help? PM ATT Uverse Care (all service problems)
or ATT Customer Care (all other problems)

Your Results May Vary, In My Humble Opinion
I Call It Like I See It, Simply a U-verse user, nothing more


Well, both, but neither matter here. It has a contract with Viacom, who is the owner of MTV, VH1, BET, etc.Viacom hasn't been affiliated with CBS for some time now.  It also has contracts with the local CBS affiliates. 

 

CBS OnDemand, though, would be controlled by AT&T's contract with CBS, owner of CBS OTA programming, TVGN,  Showtime, etc. 

*The views and opinions expressed on this forum are purely my own. Any product claim, statistic, quote, or other representation about a product or service should be verified with the manufacturer, provider, or party.

Re: Why no CBS?

7 of 7 (2,233 Views)
Share this post
Share this post