07-13-2015 12:32 PM
Solved by: Go to Solution.
11-18-2015 9:51 AM
Not a solution. People who manage or coach youth sports team use group texts to communicate immediate information such as change of time, cancellation, etc. Other carriers don't limit the groups and while I appreciate trying to curtail spam - really I do - 10 is too low. 20 would be more manageable. AT&T - you're customers are telling you they are unhappy about something. Be a customer-focused company and figure out a way to increase the group text limit.
11-18-2015 10:31 AM
In case it was not clear, ATT intentionally limits it to 10. AND, they are NOT going to change it.
Period, end of sentance.
One realizes that is not the answer one wants to hear.
BUT, it is the way it is, like it or not.
Sorry. But, thanks for playing.
- edited 12-03-2015 10:21 AM by Phil-101
Ultimately, the organization should let it's customers decide if they are willing to open themselves up to the possibility of SPIM/SPAM for the ability to send larger group text messages up. If a majority of your customers want the service, provide it.
[Edited to comply with Guidelines]
12-04-2015 2:12 PM
I just ported my lines over to AT&T and big mistake. I was with Verizon and never had this issue.
Yes. As much as I dislike Verizon, at least they understand that groups larger than 10 actually communicate via text message.
12-19-2015 9:15 PM
That is not a solution. It is the reason given and not a very good one. I do group tests to near 60+ people for our church prayer chain. The limitation requires me to send out 6 group tests to get one message out to all the people on the prayer chain. When my contract is up, I will consider another carrier for that reason.
01-05-2016 10:37 AM
as ridiculous and annoying the group text limitation is, I found that the app Whatsapp is a much better alternative for group texting. Unlimited groups can be created with 100 people in each group. Check it out https://www.whatsapp.com/
01-06-2016 1:17 PM
It's merely not possible to have some kind of "opt-in" where certain users are willing to open themselves up to potential spam by opting for a high group limit. 10 is a static figure that will never change. SMS is not meant for wide communication, e-mail is. SMS is a throwaway service for quick instant messages to a single person or small handful, but not a huge group. Too many issues can arise such as the SMSC getting flooded, intercarrier failures, etc. SMS is a tech from the 1990s. It's limited. It's archaic. This is why Apple has created iMessage and why Google has Hangouts on every new Android. They don't rely on MMS/SMS but simply need data connection.
01-15-2016 2:39 AM
01-15-2016 5:58 AM
Oh, I suspect many T-Mobile customers experience disappointment; no carrier is perfect. For example, 2G speeds once you've used your base data plan. Or limited network coverage.
01-15-2016 10:35 AM
@David606 You make it sound like 10 is a technological limit. It is not. Other carriers allow more. It is a limit that AT&T has chosen to set. "SMS is a tech from the 1990s. It's limited. It's archaic" Then why do you (and every other major carrier) still support it instead of coming together to develop something less archaic? "SMS is not meant for wide communication, email is." Maybe in the archaic 1990s that was the case because not everyone had SMS. SMS IS meant for "near instant" communication while email is not. As I said above, I volunteer coach multiple children's sports teams and they always have 10-20 members and some kids' parents both want a notification so I still end up with 21+ numbers to text, i.e. 3 groups. If there is a last minute change or cancellation due to weather or something else then email is not fast enough because although it is delivered almost as quickly, not everyone sits in front of their computer all day, not everyone has a smart phone where they can get email, and not everyone with a smartphone chooses to burn through their data plan by getting email on it.
Stop trying to make "technical" excuses and just admit that rather than trying to accomodate a REASONABLE request from their customers, AT&T wants to force people to use a third party app that will make them use more data and hopefully force them to switch to a more expensive rate plan, since SMS doesn't count against the data allocation.
01-15-2016 10:45 AM
One more thing, the SPIM (IM SPAM) excuse doesn't cut it either because spimmers don't use their phone to send spim. The 3-4 spims I have received in the 10+ years I have used texting were NEVER group messages, they were always individual messages sent by an automated process.
01-19-2016 8:33 AM
This is ridiculous. In the year 2016, you can't figure out a better way? Most families are involved in some type of group activity and they need to communicate. Email isn't an option with the coaches.
Even if you just up the limit to 18 like Verizon. I've been an AT&T customer for over 20 years...but this will force me to change carriers. As soon as we get our plan paid off in two months, I'll be switching all four of our family phones to someone that can support team group texts. This is our way of life and this isn't working!
Visit these related resourcesView Text Message Help!