03-16-2011 2:23 PM
ATT USERS BEWARE!
ATT is setting a limits on the amount of Download (Bandwith) you can use for DSL subscribers CNN posted this MSG today in its tech section. TELL ATT this wont be tolerated. If your like me watching vids via netflix, or CNN news streaming media or online gaming (Flight Sim X online) you will meet this limit very fast and be forced to pay more with 10.00 per every 50GB downloaded. Please help us reverse ATT decision on this poor choice.
CALL / EMAIL ATT AND SAY NO TO THIS POLICY!
(WIRED) -- AT&T broadband users will soon face a cap on the amount of internet data they can download a month.
Traditional DSL users will be capped at 150 GB per month, while subscribers to the fiber-backed UVerse system have a 250-GB limit. Usage over that will be charged at $10/month for 50 GB, the company says.
The company says that currently only a small percentage of users -- around 2% -- use this much data a month. If that's the case, it's not clear why the company is bothering to install the caps.
It is, however, the same rationale (and the same usage stat) that the company relied upon to explain why it would be capping iPhone data plans last summer, which had hitherto been "unlimited."
DSL and UVerse connect fairly directly to a hub -- unlike cable connections where users share a local loop that can become congested. Bulk-bandwidth costs for an ISP are a tiny portion of its business costs, and those prices continue to fall even as users consume more and more data.
So, how could a user end up hitting these caps? Streaming video such as HD movies from Netflix, using bittorrent to download movies and heavy gaming with services like Steam can easily eat up lots of data, especially in households with multiple heavy internet users.
Time Warner Cable tried going further with trials of a service that imposed very low limits for users, which led to a furor among users and lawmakers.
There's little data to demonstrate whether large ISPs actually are experiencing real issues with congestion. Skeptics see the limits as ways to discourage cable video customers from "cutting the cord" and getting their video online, or as a way to pocket profits instead of re-investing in bulking up their infrastructure.
Derek Turner, the research director for the net neutrality advocacy group Free Press says the limits will discourage online innovation, and that with the growth curve of internet usage, the limits will soon catch many internet user.
"When ISPs force their customers to watch the meter, experimentation, innovation and business will suffer," Turner said.
"AT&T's actions are another troubling symptom of a broadband market that lacks meaningful competition, and this move may be the start of a race to the bottom among other providers to see who can squeeze its customers the most. At worst, this is a plan designed to discourage cord-cutting and pad profits; at best, this is another example of an antiquated phone-company business model being forced onto an otherwise vibrant and limitless marketplace."
Thanks for reading
03-30-2011 10:43 PM
Before May, I will drop AT&T.And go cable.Enough is enough.I have already gave up my landline and wireless I went with Magic-Jack and StreightTalk. These services are better than AT&T.at lease they don't cheat you.they are up & up.This is a fare well letter to AT&T. AT&T I will fire you.You are not good for me. I am going to Road-runner.
to see what happens when companies are allowed to start capping,one only has to look at the mess canada is in
it's a downward spiral out of control.
the answer isnt just leaving AT&T, but contact your state rep,senator and the fcc and bbb,
let them know how you feel about these caps.
it's time for our elected officals to start working for the people not the overly greedy monopolies
03-31-2011 9:39 AM
The best part of this crap is that all the regular DSL customers get the same amount of bandwidth. Why should someone on a 768k plan get the same GB's as someone on a 6 mpbs plan? It's MUCH easier to go through 150 GB's at 6 mpbs than at 768k! Or that U-Verse customers get an extra 100 GB's.
The good news is if everyone leaves ATT for cable, then maybe my internet speeds will go up to what they used to be!
03-31-2011 9:46 AM - edited 03-31-2011 10:35 AM
no your speed wont go up, check the new tos if you have lets say a 3mbs connection you can
get anywhere from 1.56mbs to 3.0mbs and still be within limits so around half of what you pay for.
and the reason behind the caps isnt the 2% of users they claim.
the reason is very simple in theyre infinite wisdom AT&T sold service and continue to knowing full well
they didnt have the capabilities to handle in hopes no one would use the bandwith they pay for.
in the past that wasnt a problem but now more and more people use theyre connection for more than just
email and web browsing.
here lies the bigger problem,AT&T isnt making an effort to increase theyre capacity but continue to add
customers. so these caps are just the start they will continue to get smaller,as AT&T is betting on
wireless broadband being the norm
03-31-2011 11:31 AM
Are you kidding me, ATT? Got the email and skimmed over it on 3/27. Saw that there was now different tiers, but had no idea they were capping internet usage. The title in the email should have been "ATT to cap internet usage", now that would have gotten my attention! I actually found out about this on another forum, and not believing it, I researched it and found out it's true. It's not enough that these are hard times for many people, but Att is kicking you in the stomach while down! I went to the usage tool and got the message that they can't track internet usage on all customers, bla bla blah...Really???. Then how are you going to be able to impose the overage fees you plan to impose?. In our household we stream a lot through Netflix, do online gaming and watch you tube videos. I am guessing we will pass the allotted usage, and will be charged overages. I'm not going to stick around to find out. I hope ATT has prepared themselves for customers to leave en masses, because that they will. I'm sure a lot of customers just skimmed the e mail as I did, and ATT plans to catch them off guard. Shame on you ATT, you have just lost a long time internet and voice customer! Hear me..Step into my office, YOU'RE FIRED!. PS, I hope your proposed merger with T Mobile bites the dust.
Disgruntled soon to be EX customer...
04-05-2011 6:30 PM
I'm sorry, I did not have time to go through all the posts, but I thought I had seen a link somewhere that explains how much you'll supposedly still be able to do even with the caps (x number of song downloads, etc.)?
04-06-2011 6:38 AM
I did the math.
Any increase in DSL service = zero for AT&T
I like watching movies on Netflix and listening to music on YouTube. Living in a shared environment, I'm not the only one who enjoys these simple pleasures. I won't let AT&T penalize my recreational choices.
04-08-2011 4:30 PM - edited 04-08-2011 4:38 PM
I, also, will be looking for an alternative to AT&T for both internet and cell phone. Goodbye, AT&T.
In addition, if I WASN'T meeting the cap before, I will be now. (I'm thinking daily downloads of Linux distributions and other such things. Perhaps I'll try every flavor of Linux available (including versions), to see which one I like the best.)
I'm not certain that people replying to a thread will hammer home the anger that AT&T has caused many of it's customers. Perhaps each person should start a new thread letting AT&T know his or her feelings.
04-12-2011 6:38 PM - last edited on 04-12-2011 7:15 PM by ShaunMN
I am totally against the capping of bandwidth. If AT&T does not have the network to handle the bandwidth which they sale they need to upgrade their network. AT&T is supposed to be a leader in technology, however, they seem to be lagging behind.
[Per Guidelines: Keep it Spam Free].
04-13-2011 7:09 AM
150 gb per month is not enough.
Comcast is 250gb for the same price and faster speed too.
I cant get Uverse here only DSL.
I am going back to cable.
04-18-2011 12:12 PM
At this point I pay a ridiculous amount of money every month for my 2 wireless accounts and the u-verse which is landline, internet and tv bundled, through at&t. I have been a customer since 2006 and you would think that would count for something. I see page after page of customers mad about this new crap they are pulling yet are they doing anything about it, no. It's all about money and we are nothing but a number to them. I called to disscuss this issue with someone who of course could actually do anything about it but told me to be sure to take the survey that I would be called with and at the end I should record any other comments I had. I wasted my time taking it and there was no option at the end to leave any further comments. It's not even like I have fabulous service to begin with and now you want to take it and make it even worse? This is what I'm hearing from you at&t "Thank you so much for being such a long time loyal customer and to show how much you mean to us we are now going to treat you even worse and give you crappier service." Well as much as I appreciate that I'm gonna have to say, no thanks, since being a loyal customer doesn't mean jack to you guys I'll just cancel my u-verse account and go to the nearest cable company. And then once the wireless contract is up we'll be kissing that good-bye as well. Unfortunatly even if every person that said they are going to canel actually did it still wouldn't make a difference, they are big business and don't care about the little people that helped make them what they are.
04-18-2011 1:24 PM
If the cap 'officially' starts on 05/02, but my billing cycle (as indicated on that inaccurate 'myusage' site) is 04/17 - 05/18, does this mean that my bandwith meter is ALREADY running?
04-18-2011 1:48 PM
I have this question as well. Mine is running from 15-16. It would be smarter to have the meter count from the first of the month to the end. The meter needs to show daily totals in a real time basis as well; this 4 days of may or maybe not counted data usage is useless.
04-24-2011 10:37 AM
"we're at&t. we don't _have_ to care."
or, as lily tomlin's "ernestine" used to put it ...
didn't we have at& broken up for pretty much this very same behavior?
04-24-2011 6:13 PM - last edited on 04-25-2011 8:57 AM by pamelaz
Good post Lee_Dailey,
I cant help but wonder what Alexander would feel about all this.
AT&T wrote the book on how to screw people and the telephone had barely advanced from inception only a few years before the pen started spreading ink. I find it pretty amazing that anyone in 1907 was that intelligent to already know exactly how to screw people (starting with antitrust in the 19 00's) with the telephone to generate max profits for the next 104 years and beyond.
I guess many corporations got their hands on AT&T's book through the years, because that seems to be the code of honor amongst the profit mongers.
I actually "dont care" how many gazillion dollars AT&T makes in profits, I just plain and simply want to receive what I pay for but I dont think the Federal Gov understands that anymore then AT&T does.
Why did business take the model of "screw for profit" while having to dump billions, when simple great service would probably double those profits [Per Guidelines: Keep it Relevant and Appropriate].
I guess screwing people around just makes the job a heck of a lot more fun and keeps things from getting into boredom.
04-27-2011 8:20 PM
I have been a loyal AT&T (formerly bellsouth in my area) customer since around 1995 starting in chattanooga and now in augusta ga both for my home phone, long distance and internet (first dialup and later DSL as soon as it came out in my area) and even though comcast has made me better offers in both price and far better speed over the years I have stuck with AT&T largely because of the no caps but if they do this I will switch and cancel all my AT&T accounts.
Furthermore I will also be writing my senator and congressman to oppose the AT&T /T-mobile merger because of this.