Announcements

For the latest on our response to Coronavirus (COVID-19), click here.

Wineaux

Mentor

 • 

28 Messages

Mon, May 14, 2012 1:29 AM

Closed

802.11N Gateway?

It's been what, 4 years now for uVerse? 802.11N is now a fully ratified standard, and has been for years. Most every laptop, tablet, and cellphone is now shipping with built in 802.11N support. 802.11AC draft gear should start shipping this fall! I think most of us are sick and tired of having to put a second wireless router behind our 2Wire router for uVerse, and then not be able to use all the neat new WiFi remote apps for our cellphone's, including the most recent uVerse app. Seriously, it's time for AT&T to defecate or get off the pot and release either an 802.11N gateway, or an 802.11AC draft gateway. When can we expect to see AT&T make this very minor technological update and join the rest of us in the 21st Century?

Enquiring minds want to know...

Responses

Accepted Solution

Official Solution

Master

 • 

6.9K Messages

7 years ago


@Darknessrise wrote:

@gregzoll_1 wrote:

@RobM314 wrote:
The need for speed. 802.11g is limited to 54mbs. I want dual band at least 300+300. The ability to create SSID for visitors would be very nice.

It will not make your Internet connection any faster.  I laugh everytime someone brings up the subject of wanting Wireless-N, when their Internet speed does not give the means to even needing anything faster than Wireless-G.


You seem to be forgetting that the people using wireless won't be sitting their computer directly next to the gateway. You'll probably not even get high enough throughput a room or so away for a 23/3 tier. I was 3 or so rooms away with my gateway with 4 bars and could barely get over 7 Mbps when transfering files.

 


And wireless N would have even less range.  G is better for longer distances.

 

” Auto racing, bull fighting, and mountain climbing are the only real sports … all others are games.”- Ernest Hemingway
jr9730

Teacher

 • 

25 Messages

8 years ago

ATT has various 802.11n gateways under test in their labs now to get approved for use, as soon as they get done they will be offered to users.. When?, who knows..

Wineaux

Mentor

 • 

28 Messages

8 years ago

If they're looking for beta testers, then all they need to do is visit this forum. Plenty of motivated folks in here for that!
Computer-Joe

Master

 • 

5.9K Messages

8 years ago

They do have "N" gateways. If you want to drop your TV and VOIP and go back to ADSL. There's the Pace 4111N and the Motorola NVG510.

 

 




__________________________________________________________
How can you be in two places at once, when your not anywhere at all?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I really want to become a procrastinator, but I keep putting it off.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
There are three kinds of people, those that can count, and those that can't.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
“Our great democracies still tend to think that a stupid man is more likely to be honest than a clever man, and our politicians take advantage of this prejudice by pretending to be even more stupid than nature has made them." :Bertrand Russell

                               neon_sign.jpg

Wineaux

Mentor

 • 

28 Messages

8 years ago

That solution of course is a joke. Well, so is not having put an 802.11n gateway after all this time.
dcar335i

Teacher

 • 

22 Messages

8 years ago

What is driving your need for 802.11N?  

Tutor

 • 

2 Messages

8 years ago

If I'm not wrong, the stock 802.11g max speed is 54 mbps. I have a dual band N receiver that maxes out at 450+450... 

gamegurou

Mentor

 • 

86 Messages

8 years ago

If I'm incorrect, let me know. ATT supplies the RG's to you based on your payment to them for service (be it internet/phone/tv, what have you). Currently, U-verse does not offer 54mbps, or anything close to it, to anything other than some test areas and businesses. Why would ATT try to give you the highest end equipment if the service you are paying for can't even give you that speed?

If you're inquiring about home networking, that's not ATT's issue and you SHOULD have to buy a router in that scenario. I'm sure ATT will roll out a 802.11N RG soon, but it shouldn't be an urgency for them.
McHale72

Scholar

 • 

155 Messages

8 years ago

Just because AT&T offers a slow internet connection doesn't mean all the computers and devices in my house want to talk TO EACH OTHER on a slow connection as well.  Some of us have multiple devices that interact with each other, regardless of the internet.  Why cripple my home network because AT&T can't deliever a tolerable speed?  It's called "home networking", "internet connecting."

gamegurou

Mentor

 • 

86 Messages

8 years ago

Home networking and internet connecting are completely separate mediums. One refers to WAN one refers to LAN. What type of work are you doing that you need to have a large amount of throughput on a LAN? Certainly nothing that most users have demand for.

jimna01

Teacher

 • 

20 Messages

8 years ago

Why does one need  N?   (Which I have via the Apple Airport Extreme).  My Mac Pro Desktop acts as my primary machine.. All of my video is stored on it  and streamed to the TV and what ever other device some one wants to watch it on.   My thousand+ CD/mp3/itunes library  is likewise stored here, and all our iTune devices stream music from the shared libraries as well as being used to feed music to my surround sound system and the distributed sound system.  I use my iPad to play shared iTunes and then stream it via Airplay to my sound system, giving me a cool roving remote for my music, but hte stream has to come in from the Mac, to the ipad and backout to the Airplay devices. All in all, the N keeps up with hardly a glitch, but the hold G system just couldn' handle all the traffic.   I don't even game (no time) and I still load the N network ( Home network is 21 devices  without visitors (12 wired, 9 wireless) ).  The N is mostly for the video obviously, but also steps up to the demand of multiple devices.  It's not so much the N to access the public internet, but rather to satisfy the demands of all the devices in on the local LAN. 

 

I think this situation is likely to become the norm rather than the exception. 

Contributor

 • 

2 Messages

7 years ago

When will AT&T support 802.11AC???

Contributor

 • 

2 Messages

7 years ago

The need for speed. 802.11g is limited to 54mbs. I want dual band at least 300+300. The ability to create SSID for visitors would be very nice.
Anonymous

New Member

 • 

25.7K Messages

7 years ago


@RobM314 wrote:
The need for speed. 802.11g is limited to 54mbs. I want dual band at least 300+300. The ability to create SSID for visitors would be very nice.

It will not make your Internet connection any faster.  I laugh everytime someone brings up the subject of wanting Wireless-N, when their Internet speed does not give the means to even needing anything faster than Wireless-G.

Contributor

 • 

3 Messages

7 years ago

The solution is to disable U-verse wireless settings and install a separate wireless n or ac router.   I just did so with the Belkin 900ac router.  Set up was effortless.  I was soon streaming media on 5ghz & other data on 2.4ghz and communicating between my various computers on my home network.  The only reason I did this was to increase range as ATT's 2WIRE 3801HGV doesn't have enough range to meet my needs.   Unfortunately, neither did the  Belkin as it's range was also poor.   I picked up the Belkin at a nationally known warehouse store at only $100.   I returned the router and will switch to the ASUS RT-66U 802.11ac at about $200 which has much better range and performance.   A single band wireless n  router that has great range and performance is the D-Link DIR-645.  Originally listed at $129, it can be found as low as $69.

AT&T TV – All Your Entertainment In One Spot.  Learn more…