Reply
Posted Aug 19, 2013
3:56:53 PM
No Al Jazeera

Please do not carry Al Jazeera.  We already have plenty of, so called, news channels that are nothing more than propogandists that sell advertising time.  That last thing the American television landscape needs is to be inundated with the propoganda of Islamic extremists.

0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
View profile
Solved
Aug 20, 2013 8:49:18 AM
0
(0)
Community Manager

We dropped the Current TV channel, and will not carry Al Jazeera America, on U-verse due to contract disputes. We could not reach an agreement with the owner that we believe provided value for our customers and our business.


Rethink Possible

For account specific help, please send a private message to ATTCustomerCare

Did a post have a solution that worked for you? Help other people find solutions faster by marking posts that helped you as an "Accepted Solution". Learn about accepted solutions here.

*I am an AT&T employee and the postings on this site are my own and don’t necessarily represent AT&T’s position, strategies or opinions.
5,662 views
100 replies
(1) Me too
(1) Me too
Post reply
Replies
(100)
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
View profile
Aug 22, 2013 2:52:10 PM
0
(0)
Scholar
Dwinth- sometimes trolls have a lot of posts. Just because shoe is not a one post wonder does not mean that I do not think he is trolling here and trying to work people like me up. HE IS DEAD WRONG! I want him to post again here...in this thread to answer to the responses he had gotten. People should not ever NOT want a channel to be carried and that is the bottom line. I wish they carried EVERYTHING whether I watch it OR NOT! The more choices for people here in America THE BETTER! Sometimes I wonder if some people really believe in the constitution or not . Shoe is advocating communism here by saying that he is glad that AT&T is deciding what I can watch for me! I want him to come back and answer to this response now! I will be waiting.

Re: No Al Jazeera

31 of 101 (2,449 Views)
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
View profile
Aug 22, 2013 2:54:18 PM
0
(0)
Scholar
If Show will not respond then I will assume that he is the troll that I think he is.

Re: No Al Jazeera

32 of 101 (2,449 Views)
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
View profile
Aug 22, 2013 4:19:26 PM
0
(0)
ACE - Expert
Edited by texasguy37 on Aug 22, 2013 at 4:26:31 PM

SomeJoe7777 wrote:

shoe wrote:

Hats off to AT&T we do not need this rubbish


 

Yes, comrade!  Ve vill vatch only vhat you dictate, comrade!

 

 

 

 

So much for the Land of the Free. 


It's not the first time that he has expressed this view.

 

http://forums.att.com/t5/Features-and-How-To/Al-Jazeera-English-availability-soon/m-p/2666011

*The views and opinions expressed on this forum are purely my own. Any product claim, statistic, quote, or other representation about a product or service should be verified with the manufacturer, provider, or party.

Re: No Al Jazeera

[ Edited ]
33 of 101 (2,418 Views)
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
View profile
Aug 22, 2013 4:23:23 PM
0
(0)
ACE - Master
Edited by skeeterintexas on Aug 22, 2013 at 4:24:18 PM

codycooper864 wrote:
If Show shoe will not respond then I will assume that he is the troll that I think he is.

From Wikipedia:  A troll is a person who sows discord on the Internet by starting arguments or upsetting people,by posting inflammatory, extraneous or off-topic messages in an online community (such as a forum, chat room, or blog), either accidentally or with the deliberate intent of provoking readers into an emotional response or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion.

 

I you'd have taken the time to look over shoe's posts from the past you would know that along with the fact that he's posted over 2,200 times and he's been on these boards for over 3.5 years, he is far from a 'troll'.

 

Calling names is not nice and is frowned upon. 

 

Everyone is entitled to their opinion...whether you agree with it or not.

*The views and opinions expressed on this forum are purely my own. Any product claim, statistic, quote, or other representation about a product or service should be verified with the manufacturer, provider, or party.

Re: No Al Jazeera

[ Edited ]
34 of 101 (2,409 Views)
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
View profile
Aug 22, 2013 5:22:08 PM
0
(0)
ACE - Master

Shoe,

 While I probably wouldn't have watched the channel, there is no reason other than $$$ to keep it off the air.  I despise CNBC and CNN but I make it my choice to not watch either one.  More channels with different viewpoints is not a bad thing.

” Auto racing, bull fighting, and mountain climbing are the only real sports … all others are games.”- Ernest Hemingway
*The views and opinions expressed on this forum are purely my own. Any product claim, statistic, quote, or other representation about a product or service should be verified with the manufacturer, provider, or party.

Re: No Al Jazeera

35 of 101 (2,380 Views)
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
View profile
Aug 22, 2013 5:23:17 PM
0
(0)
ACE - Master

codycooper864 wrote:
If Show will not respond then I will assume that he is the troll that I think he is.

Just because he doesn't repsond to your childish accusations does not a troll him make.

” Auto racing, bull fighting, and mountain climbing are the only real sports … all others are games.”- Ernest Hemingway
*The views and opinions expressed on this forum are purely my own. Any product claim, statistic, quote, or other representation about a product or service should be verified with the manufacturer, provider, or party.

Re: No Al Jazeera

36 of 101 (2,380 Views)
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
View profile
Aug 22, 2013 8:29:14 PM
0
(0)
ACE - Professor

codycooper864 wrote:
Dwinth- sometimes trolls have a lot of posts. Just because shoe is not a one post wonder does not mean that I do not think he is trolling here and trying to work people like me up. HE IS DEAD WRONG! I want him to post again here...in this thread to answer to the responses he had gotten. People should not ever NOT want a channel to be carried and that is the bottom line. I wish they carried EVERYTHING whether I watch it OR NOT! The more choices for people here in America THE BETTER! Sometimes I wonder if some people really believe in the constitution or not . Shoe is advocating communism here by saying that he is glad that AT&T is deciding what I can watch for me! I want him to come back and answer to this response now! I will be waiting.

If Shoe is advocating communism here, then he is definitely a left shoe.

Owning a computer and not having the internet is like buying a refrigerator and not stocking it with food.
*The views and opinions expressed on this forum are purely my own. Any product claim, statistic, quote, or other representation about a product or service should be verified with the manufacturer, provider, or party.

Re: No Al Jazeera

37 of 101 (2,321 Views)
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
View profile
Aug 23, 2013 2:28:42 AM
0
(0)
Professor

will say one thing to you and one thing only and you
can interpret it any way you like …NUTS

Re: No Al Jazeera

38 of 101 (2,308 Views)
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
View profile
Aug 23, 2013 4:28:39 AM
0
(0)
ACE - Guru

shoe wrote:

will say one thing to you and one thing only and you
can interpret it any way you like …NUTS


Dry roasted or salted?

-------

Resident Xbox ACE. Ask me almost anything about Xbox on U-Verse.

Xbox Gamertag: americangame
PSN: americangame
Steam:americangame
When friending me mention that you found me on the AT&T forums.
*The views and opinions expressed on this forum are purely my own. Any product claim, statistic, quote, or other representation about a product or service should be verified with the manufacturer, provider, or party.

Re: No Al Jazeera

39 of 101 (2,290 Views)
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
View profile
Aug 23, 2013 8:20:53 AM
0
(0)
ACE - Master
Edited by dhascall on Aug 23, 2013 at 8:21:38 AM

Although I'm no moderator, I found this, in a post from moderator Wendigo, that sums up my feelings, to a tee.  This thread was from 2 years ago:

 

Please stop the sniping in this thread - any further posts not related the the availability of Al Jazeera will be removed. If you don't want the channel, then there's no need to comment. Thanks!

 

Sounds like a plan, eh?  :smileyhappy:

*The views and opinions expressed on this forum are purely my own. Any product claim, statistic, quote, or other representation about a product or service should be verified with the manufacturer, provider, or party.

Re: No Al Jazeera

[ Edited ]
40 of 101 (2,248 Views)
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
View profile
Aug 23, 2013 7:22:40 PM
0
(0)
Scholar

They dropped ABC News Now, which sucked. I want to see some serious news. They could put it on Channel 243 if they had to. 

 

For those who want The Blaze, how does 212 or 213 sound? Right in between Fox News and MSNBC. 

Re: No Al Jazeera

41 of 101 (2,177 Views)
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
View profile
Aug 25, 2013 10:21:12 AM
0
(0)
Tutor
Edited by Phil-101 on Aug 25, 2013 at 5:51:41 PM

Speak for yourself,"americangame". I watched Current TV and was looking forward to tuning in to some non-partisan, un-whitewashed, factual news.

 

[Please keep it courteous]

Re: No Al Jazeera

[ Edited ]
42 of 101 (2,087 Views)
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
View profile
Aug 25, 2013 10:25:51 AM
0
(0)
ACE - Master
Edited by Phil-101 on Aug 25, 2013 at 5:54:03 PM

PizzaioloMike wrote:

Speak for yourself,"americangame". I watched Current TV and was looking forward to tuning in to some non-partisan, un-whitewashed, factual news. [Please keep it courteous]


While I agree with some of your statements, name calling is frowned upon & un-neccesary.

*The views and opinions expressed on this forum are purely my own. Any product claim, statistic, quote, or other representation about a product or service should be verified with the manufacturer, provider, or party.

Re: No Al Jazeera

[ Edited ]
43 of 101 (2,081 Views)
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
View profile
Aug 25, 2013 1:05:28 PM
0
(0)
ACE - Guru
Edited by americangame on Aug 25, 2013 at 1:05:54 PM

pizza guy, let me make it clear. I don't watch any cable news. I think all of the talking heads on those shows are loud, annoying, and have no place on TV. I don't care if it's Fox News, CNN, or whoever.

 

I made the joke because Current's ratings are closer to my shoe size than to the population of Detroit.

-------

Resident Xbox ACE. Ask me almost anything about Xbox on U-Verse.

Xbox Gamertag: americangame
PSN: americangame
Steam:americangame
When friending me mention that you found me on the AT&T forums.
*The views and opinions expressed on this forum are purely my own. Any product claim, statistic, quote, or other representation about a product or service should be verified with the manufacturer, provider, or party.

Re: No Al Jazeera

[ Edited ]
44 of 101 (2,019 Views)
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
View profile
Aug 25, 2013 6:01:16 PM
0
(0)
Moderator

Hello Community Members,

I want to remind everyone to avoid any personal attacks or criticism when posting.

While we encourage debates and discussions, we would like it to be carried out in a climate of mutual respect.

Let's remember to stay on topic.

Thanks,

Phil-101
Community Moderator

Phil-101 • Community Moderator
Remember to always mark posts that resolved your issue with Accept as Solution. You can even mark multiple posts in a single thread.
This will help other users find this information too!

Re: No Al Jazeera

45 of 101 (1,975 Views)
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
View profile
Aug 29, 2013 1:07:59 PM
0
(0)
Tutor

I see no channel 189 provided.

Re: No Al Jazeera

46 of 101 (1,862 Views)
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
View profile
Aug 29, 2013 1:09:00 PM
0
(0)
Tutor

I'm not happy with that action.

Re: No Al Jazeera

47 of 101 (1,862 Views)
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
View profile
Aug 29, 2013 1:11:03 PM
0
(0)
Tutor

I watched currentTV, and I feel there is censorship in this action.

Re: No Al Jazeera

48 of 101 (1,860 Views)
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
View profile
Aug 29, 2013 1:38:04 PM
0
(0)
ACE - Master
Edited by dhascall on Aug 29, 2013 at 1:39:48 PM

markdz wrote:

I watched currentTV, and I feel there is censorship in this action.


markdz: No need for 3 separate posts.  Yes, most of us were shocked and disappointed by AT&T's decision.   Some, myself included feel that it is not a contract issue but an ideological difference and there is no place for that, IMO.  I would like to decide if I watch or not.

 

You can officially request the channel here.  Not sure if that does any good.  I am curious if any requested channel has ever been added based upon that link.

 

Since I have zero confidence in that link, one could send a private message to the escalation team at AT&T Customer Care,.  Some might feel that is extreme but it is one way of getting your point across.  I posted my concerns about U-Verse not carrying AJA on their Facebook page. 

 

*The views and opinions expressed on this forum are purely my own. Any product claim, statistic, quote, or other representation about a product or service should be verified with the manufacturer, provider, or party.

Re: No Al Jazeera

[ Edited ]
49 of 101 (1,845 Views)
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
View profile
Aug 30, 2013 8:29:44 AM
0
(0)
Scholar
Current TV and Al Jazeera is non-partisan, un-whitewashed, factual news?

HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA

Oh, that's funny....

Re: No Al Jazeera

50 of 101 (1,781 Views)
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
View profile
Aug 30, 2013 10:45:31 AM
0
(0)
ACE - Master

Evil_Homer wrote:
Current TV and Al Jazeera is non-partisan, un-whitewashed, factual news?

HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA

Oh, that's funny....

But it doesn't matter.  It doesn't matter if they are right wing, left wing, middle wing, up wing, down wing or broken wing,  The ball should be in the viewer's court to watch it or not.  I know most are tired of hearing me but my guess is that AT&T's has succumbed to the simple minded "Anti Middle East," :Anti 'fer'ner owned" faction.  Need I remind you that FOX News's Murdoch was a "fer'ner?"  He was born in Australia.

*The views and opinions expressed on this forum are purely my own. Any product claim, statistic, quote, or other representation about a product or service should be verified with the manufacturer, provider, or party.

Re: No Al Jazeera

51 of 101 (1,745 Views)
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
View profile
Aug 30, 2013 11:17:14 AM
0
(0)
Professor

Get a Roku box it is free on Roku

Re: No Al Jazeera

52 of 101 (1,743 Views)
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
View profile
Aug 30, 2013 11:29:32 AM
0
(0)
ACE - Master

shoe wrote:

Get a Roku box it is free on Roku


I have heard that AJ pulled the plug on several free ways of getting AJA, so I assumed that meant Roku.  My bad for assuming.  :smileytongue:  I have heard that they scrambled their "Freeview" DBS signal, after they went live.  Must have been pressure from the 98% of providers who carry it. :smileyvery-happy:

*The views and opinions expressed on this forum are purely my own. Any product claim, statistic, quote, or other representation about a product or service should be verified with the manufacturer, provider, or party.

Re: No Al Jazeera

53 of 101 (1,734 Views)
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
View profile
Aug 30, 2013 11:46:44 AM
0
(0)
Professor
You are right it is gone

Re: No Al Jazeera

54 of 101 (1,729 Views)
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
View profile
Sep 1, 2013 10:00:07 PM
0
(0)
Contributor
We don't need 50 home shopping channels either, but we got them. I say the more news the better and I will continue to watch them online.

Re: No Al Jazeera

55 of 101 (1,643 Views)
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
View profile
Sep 2, 2013 5:42:49 AM
0
(0)
ACE - Master

mcinla wrote:
We don't need 50 home shopping channels either, but we got them. I say the more news the better and I will continue to watch them online.

Big difference is those shopping channels PAY to be placed in the line up.  Those 50 shopping channels keep the costs from rising more than they do.

” Auto racing, bull fighting, and mountain climbing are the only real sports … all others are games.”- Ernest Hemingway
*The views and opinions expressed on this forum are purely my own. Any product claim, statistic, quote, or other representation about a product or service should be verified with the manufacturer, provider, or party.

Re: No Al Jazeera

56 of 101 (1,621 Views)
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
View profile
Sep 2, 2013 8:34:46 AM
0
(0)
Tutor

It was listed on the future programming grid, and I carefully went through several days reading the show description and selecting several I wanted to see.

 

The day of the switch, I was alarmed to see the red recording light was not on during a newscast.  When I realised the entire channel listing was gone, I felt like the victim of a pickpocket.

Re: No Al Jazeera

57 of 101 (1,594 Views)
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
View profile
Sep 5, 2013 11:58:36 AM
0
(0)
ACE - Master

pittman2000 wrote:

It was listed on the future programming grid, and I carefully went through several days reading the show description and selecting several I wanted to see.

 

The day of the switch, I was alarmed to see the red recording light was not on during a newscast.  When I realised the entire channel listing was gone, I felt like the victim of a pickpocket.


I never checked to see if the grid actually showed AJA or still showed Current.  Long story short, something must have happened in the 11th hour preventing AT&T from carrying AJA.  Maybe the same negotiator that Hallmark used?  Somebody must have gotten their feelings hurt.

*The views and opinions expressed on this forum are purely my own. Any product claim, statistic, quote, or other representation about a product or service should be verified with the manufacturer, provider, or party.

Re: No Al Jazeera

58 of 101 (1,483 Views)
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
View profile
Sep 6, 2013 1:28:45 PM
0
(0)
Professor

dwinth wrote:

LoveHD wrote:

Shoe is just like Keith who started that other thread"programming". I told him what I thought there and challenged him to answer my post, but he never did. Shoe probably won't post again either. Why?

 

 Are you, codycooper864, saying that there are trolls present here in "AT&T Community Forums?"

 

 :mansurprised:

 


There are Trolls on this forum? No! I don't believe it.  :smileysurprised:


What cracks me up is that some of the trolls have their user name in green ...

Re: No Al Jazeera

59 of 101 (1,393 Views)
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
View profile
Sep 6, 2013 1:37:40 PM
0
(0)
Professor

I did answer you I said NUTS

Re: No Al Jazeera

60 of 101 (1,380 Views)
Share this post
Share this post