Posted Feb 20, 2014
Mobile Share Value Plans Questions and Discussion

Beware.. The $160 per month plan for 4 smart phones with ATT is pretty shadey. They don't tell you that you are required to pay for 4 smart phones at full retail price. Maybe that small detail is buried somewhere in the fine print when the adds on TV play, but make sure you know exactly what you are paying for before jumping onto this.... It's very, very tricky. 

0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
Solved
2-22-2014 2:53:54 PM
0
(0)
Employee

The plan itself is the following:

$100+40/smartphone+15/basic phone

 

You get a $25 credit per line for your smartphones under the following circumstances:

  1. Your contract on your phone started prior to February 2, 2014.
  2. You are on next for your upgrade.
  3. You have no contract (applies to bring your own device).


If you do not meet the requirements for the credit you will not receive it.  You can evaluate how you want to get the device, however it breaks down that if you are on this new plan and want a new phone then bring your own device or next will come out costing you the least.

*I am an AT&T employee and the postings on this site are my own and don’t necessarily represent AT&T’s position, strategies or opinions.
65,051 views
423 replies
(16) Me too
(16) Me too
Post reply
Replies
(423)
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
Mar 12, 2014
0
(0)
Explorer

 Do the math.  Signing a contract will be more expensive than either buying the phone outright or paying for it on the NEXT plan.  Consider the LG G2.  two year contract costs $100 for the phone, $36 for activation and $40/mo for 24 months or $1100 ($1096).  On Next 12 it is $23.25 for 20 months plus $15/mo for those 20 months for a total of $765!  Or pay for the phone outright and it's still $765 for the 20 months.  Add four months to make it a full 2 years and you're paying $825.   Much less than buying on contract in this one example.

Re: ATT $160 per month for 4 lines is not actually $160!!

3,744 views
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
Mar 12, 2014
0
(0)
ACE - Expert

urbhusker wrote:

 Do the math.  Signing a contract will be more expensive than either buying the phone outright or paying for it on the NEXT plan.  Consider the LG G2.  two year contract costs $100 for the phone, $36 for activation and $40/mo for 24 months or $1100 ($1096).  On Next 12 it is $23.25 for 20 months plus $15/mo for those 20 months for a total of $765!  Or pay for the phone outright and it's still $765 for the 20 months.  Add four months to make it a full 2 years and you're paying $825.   Much less than buying on contract in this one example.


One correction - there is a activation fee on the Mobiel Value Share plans

 

http://www.att.com/shop/wireless/data-plans.html#fbid=yKiX0roX6QJ

 

What is the smartphone activation fee if a customer brings their own device?

A $36 activation fee applies for customers bringing their own device.

*The views and opinions expressed on this forum are purely my own. Any product claim, statistic, quote, or other representation about a product or service should be verified with the manufacturer, provider, or party.

Re: ATT $160 per month for 4 lines is not actually $160!!

3,739 views
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
Mar 13, 2014
0
(0)
Teacher

So last night after sending a private message I got a call from AT&T about my billing problem.

 

As most people are thinking here, yes you are supposed to get that $15/line price immediately. However, there is a bug/glitch in the system that will not reflect it correctly if you future date the plan change. According to the man I spoke with that bug has since then been fixed, but probably impacted people who switched prior to maybe the last week or so. He went ahead and applied the overpaid amount from my previous bill as a credit on the next bill, so things should be correct in future bills.

Re: ATT $160 per month for 4 lines is not actually $160!!

3,706 views
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
Mar 13, 2014
0
(0)
ACE - Expert

ecmillan wrote:

So last night after sending a private message I got a call from AT&T about my billing problem.

 

As most people are thinking here, yes you are supposed to get that $15/line price immediately. However, there is a bug/glitch in the system that will not reflect it correctly if you future date the plan change. According to the man I spoke with that bug has since then been fixed, but probably impacted people who switched prior to maybe the last week or so. He went ahead and applied the overpaid amount from my previous bill as a credit on the next bill, so things should be correct in future bills.


Good info. That would explain why it all went without a hitch for us as we made the switch on the first day of the billing cycle.

*The views and opinions expressed on this forum are purely my own. Any product claim, statistic, quote, or other representation about a product or service should be verified with the manufacturer, provider, or party.

Re: ATT $160 per month for 4 lines is not actually $160!!

3,699 views
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
Mar 13, 2014
0
(0)
Explorer

wingrider01 wrote:

urbhusker wrote:

 Do the math.  Signing a contract will be more expensive than either buying the phone outright or paying for it on the NEXT plan.  Consider the LG G2.  two year contract costs $100 for the phone, $36 for activation and $40/mo for 24 months or $1100 ($1096).  On Next 12 it is $23.25 for 20 months plus $15/mo for those 20 months for a total of $765!  Or pay for the phone outright and it's still $765 for the 20 months.  Add four months to make it a full 2 years and you're paying $825.   Much less than buying on contract in this one example.


One correction - there is a activation fee on the Mobiel Value Share plans

 

http://www.att.com/shop/wireless/data-plans.html#fbid=yKiX0roX6QJ

 

What is the smartphone activation fee if a customer brings their own device?

A $36 activation fee applies for customers bringing their own device.


Hmmm, I just upgraded two lines using NEXT last week and the week before and wasn't charged an activation fee.  Thought that was just for contract renews.  Doesn't matter as the cost, at least for the G2, is still cheaper than a 2 year contract upgrade.  So, for me, I like the new plan as I did my homework and did the math before upgrading (as opposed to just complaining for the sake of complaining).

Re: ATT $160 per month for 4 lines is not actually $160!!

3,690 views
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
Mar 13, 2014
0
(0)
ACE - Professor

wingrider01 wrote:

urbhusker wrote:

 Do the math.  Signing a contract will be more expensive than either buying the phone outright or paying for it on the NEXT plan.  Consider the LG G2.  two year contract costs $100 for the phone, $36 for activation and $40/mo for 24 months or $1100 ($1096).  On Next 12 it is $23.25 for 20 months plus $15/mo for those 20 months for a total of $765!  Or pay for the phone outright and it's still $765 for the 20 months.  Add four months to make it a full 2 years and you're paying $825.   Much less than buying on contract in this one example.


One correction - there is a activation fee on the Mobiel Value Share plans

 

http://www.att.com/shop/wireless/data-plans.html#fbid=yKiX0roX6QJ

 

What is the smartphone activation fee if a customer brings their own device?

A $36 activation fee applies for customers bringing their own device.


Activation fees are for new customers.  An existing customer who upgrades shouldn't have to pay an upgrade fee with the Next plan.

*The views and opinions expressed on this forum are purely my own. Any product claim, statistic, quote, or other representation about a product or service should be verified with the manufacturer, provider, or party.

Re: ATT $160 per month for 4 lines is not actually $160!!

3,679 views
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
Mar 13, 2014
0
(0)
ACE - Professor
NEXT is not officially an upgrade, you are changing phones. An upgrade causes a new 2 year contract,NEXT doesn't. NEXT is just an agreement to buy a phone. As AT&T looks at it, it isn't really an upgrade.
*The views and opinions expressed on this forum are purely my own. Any product claim, statistic, quote, or other representation about a product or service should be verified with the manufacturer, provider, or party.

Re: ATT $160 per month for 4 lines is not actually $160!!

3,683 views
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
Mar 13, 2014
0
(0)
Explorer

kdfederer wrote:
NEXT is not officially an upgrade, you are changing phones. An upgrade causes a new 2 year contract,NEXT doesn't. NEXT is just an agreement to buy a phone. As AT&T looks at it, it isn't really an upgrade.

And?  It's still cheaper than "upgrading".   I changed phones because it's cheaper than an "upgrade". and I was ready to try a new phone.  Plus I'm not really in a contract.  I just was pointing out the NEXT plan is a nice option for people to save money contrary to what a lot of people are saying on the forums (people that complain just to complain and don't bother to research first).  Yes, AT&T cell service is still expensive but for me it's the cheapest option by far outside of T-Mobile (and T-Mobile isn't a real option in central Iowa...even if they were AT&T is neck and neck in pricing now). 

Re: ATT $160 per month for 4 lines is not actually $160!!

3,667 views
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
Mar 13, 2014
0
(0)
ACE - Professor

urbhusker wrote:

kdfederer wrote:
NEXT is not officially an upgrade, you are changing phones. An upgrade causes a new 2 year contract,NEXT doesn't. NEXT is just an agreement to buy a phone. As AT&T looks at it, it isn't really an upgrade.

And?  It's still cheaper than "upgrading".   I changed phones because it's cheaper than an "upgrade". and I was ready to try a new phone.  Plus I'm not really in a contract.  I just was pointing out the NEXT plan is a nice option for people to save money contrary to what a lot of people are saying on the forums (people that complain just to complain and don't bother to research first).  Yes, AT&T cell service is still expensive but for me it's the cheapest option by far outside of T-Mobile (and T-Mobile isn't a real option in central Iowa...even if they were AT&T is neck and neck in pricing now). 


I think that kdfederer was responding to my response to wingrider01's post. 

 

Everyone doesn't save money with the Next plan.  Each person has to do the math to compare the current plan and the Next option to see which works best for him/her.  For some, Next plus Mobile Share Value is cheaper; for others, the two-year contract with an old plan is cheaper.

*The views and opinions expressed on this forum are purely my own. Any product claim, statistic, quote, or other representation about a product or service should be verified with the manufacturer, provider, or party.

Re: ATT $160 per month for 4 lines is not actually $160!!

3,651 views
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
Mar 13, 2014
0
(0)
ACE - Expert

urbhusker wrote:

wingrider01 wrote:

urbhusker wrote:

 Do the math.  Signing a contract will be more expensive than either buying the phone outright or paying for it on the NEXT plan.  Consider the LG G2.  two year contract costs $100 for the phone, $36 for activation and $40/mo for 24 months or $1100 ($1096).  On Next 12 it is $23.25 for 20 months plus $15/mo for those 20 months for a total of $765!  Or pay for the phone outright and it's still $765 for the 20 months.  Add four months to make it a full 2 years and you're paying $825.   Much less than buying on contract in this one example.


One correction - there is a activation fee on the Mobiel Value Share plans

 

http://www.att.com/shop/wireless/data-plans.html#fbid=yKiX0roX6QJ

 

What is the smartphone activation fee if a customer brings their own device?

A $36 activation fee applies for customers bringing their own device.


Hmmm, I just upgraded two lines using NEXT last week and the week before and wasn't charged an activation fee.  Thought that was just for contract renews.  Doesn't matter as the cost, at least for the G2, is still cheaper than a 2 year contract upgrade.  So, for me, I like the new plan as I did my homework and did the math before upgrading (as opposed to just complaining for the sake of complaining).


wait for your first bill after the upgrade and see what is there - the activation fees are on the bill

*The views and opinions expressed on this forum are purely my own. Any product claim, statistic, quote, or other representation about a product or service should be verified with the manufacturer, provider, or party.

Re: ATT $160 per month for 4 lines is not actually $160!!

3,642 views
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
Mar 13, 2014
0
(0)
ACE - Expert

wingrider01 wrote:

urbhusker wrote:

wingrider01 wrote:

urbhusker wrote:

 Do the math.  Signing a contract will be more expensive than either buying the phone outright or paying for it on the NEXT plan.  Consider the LG G2.  two year contract costs $100 for the phone, $36 for activation and $40/mo for 24 months or $1100 ($1096).  On Next 12 it is $23.25 for 20 months plus $15/mo for those 20 months for a total of $765!  Or pay for the phone outright and it's still $765 for the 20 months.  Add four months to make it a full 2 years and you're paying $825.   Much less than buying on contract in this one example.


One correction - there is a activation fee on the Mobiel Value Share plans

 

http://www.att.com/shop/wireless/data-plans.html#fbid=yKiX0roX6QJ

 

What is the smartphone activation fee if a customer brings their own device?

A $36 activation fee applies for customers bringing their own device.


Hmmm, I just upgraded two lines using NEXT last week and the week before and wasn't charged an activation fee.  Thought that was just for contract renews.  Doesn't matter as the cost, at least for the G2, is still cheaper than a 2 year contract upgrade.  So, for me, I like the new plan as I did my homework and did the math before upgrading (as opposed to just complaining for the sake of complaining).


wait for your first bill after the upgrade and see what is there - the activation fees are on the bill


We have switched 3 smartphones and one feature phone to MSV, then I upgraded the 4th line to a smartphone a week later by bringing my own device. My first bill after the switch didn't include any activation fees and my first bill after the upgrade didn't include an activation fee either.

 

Also, activation fee has always referred to new plans/new lines. Upgrade fee referred to buying a new device under contract at subsidized price.

*The views and opinions expressed on this forum are purely my own. Any product claim, statistic, quote, or other representation about a product or service should be verified with the manufacturer, provider, or party.

Re: ATT $160 per month for 4 lines is not actually $160!!

[ Edited ]
3,645 views
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
Mar 13, 2014
0
(0)
Mentor

The next plan makes you pay taxes on the cost of the phone but no upgrade fee. I not sure if an activation fee applies because you are already an active account.

Re: ATT $160 per month for 4 lines is not actually $160!!

3,632 views
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
Mar 13, 2014
0
(0)
ACE - Professor

wingrider01 wrote:

urbhusker wrote:

wingrider01 wrote:

urbhusker wrote:

 Do the math.  Signing a contract will be more expensive than either buying the phone outright or paying for it on the NEXT plan.  Consider the LG G2.  two year contract costs $100 for the phone, $36 for activation and $40/mo for 24 months or $1100 ($1096).  On Next 12 it is $23.25 for 20 months plus $15/mo for those 20 months for a total of $765!  Or pay for the phone outright and it's still $765 for the 20 months.  Add four months to make it a full 2 years and you're paying $825.   Much less than buying on contract in this one example.


One correction - there is a activation fee on the Mobiel Value Share plans

 

http://www.att.com/shop/wireless/data-plans.html#fbid=yKiX0roX6QJ

 

What is the smartphone activation fee if a customer brings their own device?

A $36 activation fee applies for customers bringing their own device.


Hmmm, I just upgraded two lines using NEXT last week and the week before and wasn't charged an activation fee.  Thought that was just for contract renews.  Doesn't matter as the cost, at least for the G2, is still cheaper than a 2 year contract upgrade.  So, for me, I like the new plan as I did my homework and did the math before upgrading (as opposed to just complaining for the sake of complaining).


wait for your first bill after the upgrade and see what is there - the activation fees are on the bill


First, urbhusker said that he upgraded two lines using Next.  Your link referenced the Mobile Share Value plans.  These are two different things.  The relevant link is found here.  It says that there are no activation and no upgrade fees on the Next program. 

 

Second, if someone is upgrading with a two-year contract, that person would be charged an upgrade fee, not an activation fee.

*The views and opinions expressed on this forum are purely my own. Any product claim, statistic, quote, or other representation about a product or service should be verified with the manufacturer, provider, or party.

Re: ATT $160 per month for 4 lines is not actually $160!!

3,617 views
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
Mar 13, 2014
0
(0)
Contributor

i am having a bill issue as well. after chating with a representative i printed the conversation, i was billed for last month's usage along with next months rates. i tried talking to another agent and was told i would be credited over the next two billing cycles. That just does not make any sense to me. ive been a customer since 2000 and it makes no sense to bill me for what i have not used yet then turn around and credit me for it. i understand if i was a new customer. i was told $15 a phone and charged $40.

Re: ATT $160 per month for 4 lines is not actually $160!!

3,605 views
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
Mar 13, 2014
0
(0)
Contributor
well after my issues I asked to speak with management...im still waiting on that call. Been a day, guess ill have to call tomorrow. customer since 2000, makes no sense billing me for usage I have not used yet.

Re: ATT $160 per month for 4 lines is not actually $160!!

3,611 views
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
Mar 14, 2014
0
(0)
Explorer

21stNow wrote:

wingrider01 wrote:

urbhusker wrote:

wingrider01 wrote:

urbhusker wrote:

 Do the math.  Signing a contract will be more expensive than either buying the phone outright or paying for it on the NEXT plan.  Consider the LG G2.  two year contract costs $100 for the phone, $36 for activation and $40/mo for 24 months or $1100 ($1096).  On Next 12 it is $23.25 for 20 months plus $15/mo for those 20 months for a total of $765!  Or pay for the phone outright and it's still $765 for the 20 months.  Add four months to make it a full 2 years and you're paying $825.   Much less than buying on contract in this one example.


One correction - there is a activation fee on the Mobiel Value Share plans

 

http://www.att.com/shop/wireless/data-plans.html#fbid=yKiX0roX6QJ

 

What is the smartphone activation fee if a customer brings their own device?

A $36 activation fee applies for customers bringing their own device.


Hmmm, I just upgraded two lines using NEXT last week and the week before and wasn't charged an activation fee.  Thought that was just for contract renews.  Doesn't matter as the cost, at least for the G2, is still cheaper than a 2 year contract upgrade.  So, for me, I like the new plan as I did my homework and did the math before upgrading (as opposed to just complaining for the sake of complaining).


wait for your first bill after the upgrade and see what is there - the activation fees are on the bill


First, urbhusker said that he upgraded two lines using Next.  Your link referenced the Mobile Share Value plans.  These are two different things.  The relevant link is found here.  It says that there are no activation and no upgrade fees on the Next program. 

 

Second, if someone is upgrading with a two-year contract, that person would be charged an upgrade fee, not an activation fee.


Yes I was already on the 10gb mobile value plan (switched soon after they became available) and upgraded two phones..I mean exchanged/changed/bought....and went with the NEXT plan due to the lower overall cost.  And no, I wasn't charged an activation fee (or any other named fee) but was charged the taxes on the phones.  Better deal than "upgrading" and signing a two year agreement. 

Re: ATT $160 per month for 4 lines is not actually $160!!

3,574 views
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
Mar 14, 2014
0
(0)
Employee

Koapof3 wrote:

i am having a bill issue as well. after chating with a representative i printed the conversation, i was billed for last month's usage along with next months rates. i tried talking to another agent and was told i would be credited over the next two billing cycles. That just does not make any sense to me. ive been a customer since 2000 and it makes no sense to bill me for what i have not used yet then turn around and credit me for it. i understand if i was a new customer. i was told $15 a phone and charged $40.


This is normal


Based on my plan, AT&T sends me the bill for march, in the first week of that month, but my due data is not until the end of the month. If I used more than the plan I paid for in march, then AT&T will add the extra's to my April bill.

 

You are paying in advance. By the time the due date comes around, it's only a few days until the end of the cycle, so at best, you might be a few days ahead..

-Alex

*I am an AT&T employee and the postings on this site are my own and don’t necessarily represent AT&T’s position, strategies or opinions.

Re: ATT $160 per month for 4 lines is not actually $160!!

[ Edited ]
3,545 views
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
Mar 16, 2014
0
(0)
Contributor

Thanks for the heads up, but that includes tax and other fees or after tax and other fees?

Re: ATT $160 per month for 4 lines is not actually $160!!

3,466 views
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
Mar 16, 2014
0
(0)
ACE - Expert

siteber wrote:

Thanks for the heads up, but that includes tax and other fees or after tax and other fees?


$160 is pre-tax & fees, so the total will be more.

*The views and opinions expressed on this forum are purely my own. Any product claim, statistic, quote, or other representation about a product or service should be verified with the manufacturer, provider, or party.

Re: ATT $160 per month for 4 lines is not actually $160!!

3,468 views
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
Mar 17, 2014
0
(0)
Tutor

Have you seen the ads on TV about the 4 lines for $160/month.  Seems great, since I was previously paying over $215/ month for 3 phones for ATT's wireless service.  Well I switched to the new Family share plan for the 3 phones that I had and the cost reduced to $145/month.  BUT THEN I decided to add 1 more phone yesterday for my youngest son and guess what.  It is not an additional $15/month, but an additional $40/month.  Bet you didn't see that in all of the advertising still being shown on TV ads to this day...neither did I.  I bought the phone at Walmart because of the reduced pricing on the phone and the replacement plan.  No one there said anything about $40/month either.  Sounds like a Bait and Switch deal going on here!!!  So today I saw on my bill that it did indeed go up an additional $40, so I called about it and had to talk to a "supervisor" to get the whole story and yet no honoring of the advertisement.  I got the "some restrictions apply" speech.  Well doesn't ATT think that this information about that the deal does not apply to new lines added or anything after Feb 2nd should be clearly plastered all over the advertising and in the dealer stores???   Wait, what, oh yeah never mind, they are attempting to sell you something that you are not actually going to get...........  When I asked the "supervisor" that I could not possibly be the only person that is calling about this same issue, then I got silence and upon my response of "give me a break" he responded with " I cannot lie, you are one of many..."  I feel as if I have been betrayed by false advertising and stripped of $25/month extra for as long as I have a contract with ATT.  ATT needs to rethink their advertising methods as I am sure that this is going to get them serious negative attention.  I certainly will not recommend this to anyone that I know who is considering ATT.  I have not always been pleased with ATT, but today I am.  I will say that the 2 persons that I spoke with at ATT were polite and the "supervisor" attempted to pacify me with a $100 credit for the misleading advertising, but I want $600 credit divided into $25 monthly increments applied to my account for the next 24 months.  Once this happens, I will be happy with ATT again and will consider to stay with them after the contract is complete.

 

[word filter avoidance]

Family plan is not as advertised.

[ Edited ]
3,478 views
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
Mar 17, 2014
0
(0)
Mentor

loganic wrote:

Koapof3 wrote:

i am having a bill issue as well. after chating with a representative i printed the conversation, i was billed for last month's usage along with next months rates. i tried talking to another agent and was told i would be credited over the next two billing cycles. That just does not make any sense to me. ive been a customer since 2000 and it makes no sense to bill me for what i have not used yet then turn around and credit me for it. i understand if i was a new customer. i was told $15 a phone and charged $40.


This is normal


Based on my plan, AT&T sends me the bill for march, in the first week of that month, but my due data is not until the end of the month. If I used more than the plan I paid for in march, then AT&T will add the extra's to my April bill.

 

You are paying in advance. By the time the due date comes around, it's only a few days until the end of the cycle, so at best, you might be a few days ahead..

-Alex


It is NOT NORMAL for a $15 line to be billed at $40. Help the person with the over billing and tell them where to get it corrected.

 

 

Re: ATT $160 per month for 4 lines is not actually $160!!

3,402 views
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
Mar 17, 2014
0
(0)
Employee

Hello!

 

Sorry to hear you feel you've been misled.

 

AT&T is very open and clear about the plans and prices and promotions. You added your new line at Walmart. They are an authorized retailer for AT&T. The store rep you spoke to their should have informed you of the price plans and agreements.

 

On a 10GIG Mobile Share Value plan, it breaks down as follows.

 

10 Gigs of Data = $100

Each Smartphone with no contract, on a NEXT installment plan = $15 *

Smartphones that have a 2 Year Contract = $40

 

* Any smart phone that was entered into a 2 year agreement prior to February 1, 2014 qualifies for the $15 Non Contract pricing.

 

So four smart phones that meet the above criteria qualify for the $160 pricing.

 

If you added a fourth smartphone and signed a two year contract on it after February 1 of this year, it falls into the $40 price plan.

 

The reason for this is when you purchase a phone, we'll use an iPhone as an example here, you can get an iPhone 5S for $199.99. The phone retail value is $649.99. AT&T in turn pays the difference for you to get the phone at the 2 year price. After you've completed your contract, the price will return to the $15.

 

You have a 14 day window where you can return the phone as well with a restocking fee of $35.

 

 

Below is a image taken from the commercial which shows the 4 lines for $160 plan. In fine print at the bottom it does state W/ No Annual Contract.

 

If you have any other questions, let us know.

 

Thanks!

 

 

 

ATT.jpg

 

*I am an AT&T employee and the postings on this site are my own and don’t necessarily represent AT&T’s position, strategies or opinions.

Re: Family plan is not as advertised.

3,483 views
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
Mar 17, 2014
0
(0)
Mentor

Same song different verse. The most negative thing about the Mobile Share Plan is not clearly advertised.

Re: Family plan is not as advertised.

3,431 views
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
Mar 18, 2014
0
(0)
Tutor
To JMill09. No ATT is not clear and open with their advertising. You said it yourself. In the "fine print of the ad". And look at the grey on grey text. I don't 'feel' mislead, I am mislead. By you and Walmart. Why isn't there clear signage in the store? Why are so many people calling and writing about the same problem? Is ATT so ignorant about the pattern that has developed, or simply blinded by the finicial impact of the false (misleading) advertising? I think it is funny how ATT has thought that they are doing their customers a favor by reduced cost when in fact, all that was done was a shift in cost from the plan to full price phones or pay for the phone in monthly installments. I hope Clark Howard and the like will rip you to shreds soon. ATT deserves what they get from this one

Re: Family plan is not as advertised.

3,412 views
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
Mar 18, 2014
0
(0)
Scholar

it is what it is.  ATT states that you will pay full price when you upgrade.  I was told this when I switched to the new plan.  

 

It amazes me that people think they should get the 15 a month if you buy a subsidised phone.  That 25 extra covers the cost of the phone.  

 

What you should have done was buy a used smart phone and add it to the line.  Or better yet the moto g is only 179 bucks or nexus 5 for 350.  

 

If people want subsidised phones this plan is not for them.  This is for next customers or BYOD people

Re: Family plan is not as advertised.

[ Edited ]
3,373 views
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
Mar 18, 2014
0
(0)
ACE - Expert

kab716 wrote:

Have you seen the ads on TV about the 4 lines for $160/month.  Seems great, since I was previously paying over $215/ month for 3 phones for ATT's wireless service.  Well I switched to the new Family share plan for the 3 phones that I had and the cost reduced to $145/month.  BUT THEN I decided to add 1 more phone yesterday for my youngest son and guess what.  It is not an additional $15/month, but an additional $40/month.  Bet you didn't see that in all of the advertising still being shown on TV ads to this day...neither did I.  I bought the phone at Walmart because of the reduced pricing on the phone and the replacement plan.  No one there said anything about $40/month either.  Sounds like a Bait and Switch deal going on here!!!  So today I saw on my bill that it did indeed go up an additional $40, so I called about it and had to talk to a "supervisor" to get the whole story and yet no honoring of the advertisement.  I got the "some restrictions apply" speech.  Well doesn't ATT think that this information about that the deal does not apply to new lines added or anything after Feb 2nd should be clearly plastered all over the advertising and in the dealer stores???   Wait, what, oh yeah never mind, they are attempting to sell you something that you are not actually going to get...........  When I asked the "supervisor" that I could not possibly be the only person that is calling about this same issue, then I got silence and upon my response of "give me a break" he responded with " I cannot lie, you are one of many..."  I feel as if I have been betrayed by false advertising and stripped of $25/month extra for as long as I have a contract with ATT.  ATT needs to rethink their advertising methods as I am sure that this is going to get them serious negative attention.  I certainly will not recommend this to anyone that I know who is considering ATT.  I have not always been pleased with ATT, but today I am.  I will say that the 2 persons that I spoke with at ATT were polite and the "supervisor" attempted to pacify me with a $100 credit for the misleading advertising, but I want $600 credit divided into $25 monthly increments applied to my account for the next 24 months.  Once this happens, I will be happy with ATT again and will consider to stay with them after the contract is complete.

 

[word filter avoidance]


Actually it is disclosed, if you would add the phone utilizing the Next plan it is 15.00, but if you want a subsidized phone it is 40.00

 

att_value.PNG

*The views and opinions expressed on this forum are purely my own. Any product claim, statistic, quote, or other representation about a product or service should be verified with the manufacturer, provider, or party.

Re: Family plan is not as advertised.

3,363 views
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
Mar 18, 2014
0
(0)
ACE - Expert

wingrider01 wrote:

Actually it is disclosed, if you would add the phone utilizing the Next plan it is 15.00, but if you want a subsidized phone it is 40.00

 

att_value.PNG


 LOL, your screen shot is the perfect example of it not being disclosed. Sure, it tells you all the cases of when it costs $15, but how much it'll cost on subsidy is nowhere in your example.

*The views and opinions expressed on this forum are purely my own. Any product claim, statistic, quote, or other representation about a product or service should be verified with the manufacturer, provider, or party.

Re: Family plan is not as advertised.

3,349 views
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
Mar 18, 2014
0
(0)
Mentor

You are exactly right it does not make it clear.

 

Its so clear that the AT&T rep told me to buy an Iphone 5c at Target at the substized price of $100 and that line would be $15 per month. Another told me to go back to my old plan and get a substidized phone then change to the Mobile Share Plan and it would be $15 a line. This was after the cut off of Feb 2nd and would not have qualified.  Both given information was wrong.

 

The plan is so simple the AT&T employees can't give accurate information.

Re: Family plan is not as advertised.

3,343 views
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
Mar 18, 2014
0
(0)
Scholar

--- Available with AT&T NextSM or if you purchase your smartphones at full retail price. You’re also eligible if you’re out of annual contract or bring your own device. 


----For plans 10GB or higher, AT&T customers with smartphones on 2-yr agreements as of 2/1/14 are eligible for the $15/mo. rate. For plans 2GB to 6GB, AT&T customers with smartphones on 2-yr agreements as of 3/8/14 are eligible for the $25/mo. rate. If upgrading, must comply with then-current req's to keep discounted smartphone rate.

Re: Family plan is not as advertised.

[ Edited ]
3,339 views
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
Mar 18, 2014
0
(0)
Scholar

last line in my last post says it all

Re: Family plan is not as advertised.

3,338 views
Share this post
Share this post