Reply
Posted Sep 9, 2012
11:51:48 AM
View profile
ANDROID UPDATES NEED ***SERIOUS*** REFORM!!!

Bottom line, this whole business of carriers controlling the updates has GOT TO GO.  A few nights ago, I had to drive 15 miles out to the only official AT&T service center in my metro area, because ever since I updated my Samsung Captivate to the Android 2.3.5 Gingerbread OS, I have had a plethora of problems ranging from very poor battery life to bad GPS to lockups so bad I couldn't even turn the phone off without removing and then putting the battery back in (try doing that with some of these newer phones with built-in batteries - DUMB IDEA!).  When I got to the AT&T service center the woman (who had kind of a snotty attitude like I was a number) said there have been some known issues with updates people have done with Kies, and mentioned something vaguely about Ice Cream Sandwich that just got pushed out, so my ears perked up ("ICS is available for the Captivate now?")  That got me excited, even though it's still not the latest Android as we all know, Jelly Bean is.  She said no, she was talking about other phone models that got ICS pushed to it.  Stupid woman, why the he-- would you mention other phones to me when they're not relevant to me??  So no, I found out that AT&T EXCLUSIVELY got a better Gingerbread update (which is still eons behind the latest Android update) with the bug fixes.  But *I*, the customer and the user, couldn't simply have downloaded that bug fix from either Samsung, AT&T, or Google.  And what I say to that is, WHY THE HE-- NOT!!!???  Do the carriers love to just make customers waste gas and time and wait in long lines for something that should be so simple!!??  This is a really FOULED UP way the cell phone industry works in the U.S.

 

WE THE CUSTOMERS of Android products EMPHATICALLY DEMAND that you carriers RELINQUISH CONTROL over all Android software, and let all of us, no matter what phone or tablet, DOWNLOAD THE LATEST ANDROID OPERATING SYSTEM DIRECTLY FROM GOOGLE.  YOU GOT THAT!!??  Google, are you reading this??  Make downloading and installing Android as easy and simple as upgrading to the latest version of Windows on a PC, and leave the carriers out of this whole thing.  And AT&T, if you're reading this, you can stick your uninstallable AT&T Radio and U-Verse Live TV apps up your...

ANDROID UPDATES NEED ***SERIOUS*** REFORM!!!

4,416 views
28 replies
(0) Me too
(0) Me too
Post reply
Replies
(28)
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
View profile
Sep 9, 2012 11:54:45 AM
0
(0)
Teacher

Oh yeah, and for some reason you don't do this to Apple iPhone owners, so why Android, huh?

Re: ANDROID UPDATES NEED ***SERIOUS*** REFORM!!!

2 of 29 (4,415 Views)
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
View profile
Sep 9, 2012 6:58:39 PM
0
(0)
Professor

All updates are not 100% controlled by the carriers. Samsung has to create the new OS for the phone before pushing out to the carriers. If Samsung decides not to create Jelly Bean/ICS for the Captivate (most likely because the specs arent powerful enough), then AT&T cannot release it. 

 

As for your problems, have you tried factory resetting your phone? It usually fixes a lot of problems right after an update. It will "refresh" your OS as I like to put it.

 

You also might wanna post in forums or try and research answers to your problems before deciding to drive out that far, because some problems are just simple fixes

 

Re: ANDROID UPDATES NEED ***SERIOUS*** REFORM!!!

3 of 29 (4,359 Views)
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
View profile
Sep 9, 2012 7:07:44 PM
0
(0)
Teacher

That response still does not address a fundamental issue -- WHY is Android plagued with the chronic problems of OS fragmentation as I described, plus skins and bloatware from the manufacturer and carrier?  The iPhone is carried by 3 of the major U.S. carriers, yet no iPhone is ever riddled with bloatware or OS skins, nor do iPhone owners ever have to wait for an update -- it comes right away directly from Apple.  There is a definite difference in treatment by the carriers between Android and iOS.

Re: ANDROID UPDATES NEED ***SERIOUS*** REFORM!!!

4 of 29 (4,355 Views)
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
View profile
Sep 9, 2012 7:29:51 PM
0
(0)
Professor
Well I do agree with you on some part, but the reason why Apple is easier because they do not have to go through different manufacturers to make updates for specific phones. They only have iPhone and thats it, so it its easier for them. Androis is on HTC, Samsung, Nokia, and many more manufacturers, so its up to the manufacturers to make the OS for their specific phones fast enough. If anything, its the manufacturers fault for releasing slow updates, not AT&T.

Re: ANDROID UPDATES NEED ***SERIOUS*** REFORM!!!

5 of 29 (4,352 Views)
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
View profile
Sep 10, 2012 7:01:44 AM
0
(0)
ACE - Professor
Edited by redpoint73 on Sep 10, 2012 at 7:03:37 AM

Yes, there is a huge difference in the carrier/manufacturer relationship of iOS versus Android, this is obvious to anyone that follows smartphones.   Apple has a lot of name cache and influence, and basically blackmail carriers into accepting what Apple wants, which is no carrier branding on the iPhone firmware, they are in charge of updating the OS, etc.  If the carriers want the iPhone (which they all do) they have to accept Apple's terms.  Its a change in the way things have been done in the industry, and its the exception to the rule.  For Android manufacturers, its really the other way around.  If the Android manufacters want AT&T to carry their phones, the manufacturers usually bend to AT&T's will.

 

And as already mentioned, iPhone just has one manufacurer and device.  Android has many manufacturers and dozens of current devices.  Skins and other OS modifications are the way these manufacturers differentiate themselves from one another.  Call it variety or call it fragmentation.  But its both one of Androids greatest strengths and weaknesses at the same time.

 

If you want things done the way Apple does it, buy an iPhone.  If you want freedom and choice, buy Android.

*The views and opinions expressed on this forum are purely my own. Any product claim, statistic, quote, or other representation about a product or service should be verified with the manufacturer, provider, or party.

Re: ANDROID UPDATES NEED ***SERIOUS*** REFORM!!!

[ Edited ]
6 of 29 (4,321 Views)
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
View profile
Sep 10, 2012 8:02:23 AM
0
(0)
Tutor

Excellent reply!  I get so sick of hearing the whining about fragmentation.

Re: ANDROID UPDATES NEED ***SERIOUS*** REFORM!!!

7 of 29 (4,307 Views)
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
View profile
Sep 10, 2012 8:08:06 AM
0
(0)
Professor

Great reply Red

Re: ANDROID UPDATES NEED ***SERIOUS*** REFORM!!!

8 of 29 (4,303 Views)
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
View profile
Sep 10, 2012 10:43:16 AM
0
(0)
Teacher

Sure, pass the buck, carriers.  Then how do you explain the PC industry, where Microsoft made one Windows OS at a time, and, assuming you had the horsepower, you could put it on a Dell, an HP, a Gateway, you name it?  You always got the OS directly from Microsoft.  You didn't have to rely on individual PC mfrs. to push out their own iterations of Windows.  Why is smartphone technology not as modular?

Re: ANDROID UPDATES NEED ***SERIOUS*** REFORM!!!

9 of 29 (4,270 Views)
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
View profile
Sep 10, 2012 10:54:52 AM
0
(0)
Teacher

I know, Google should have had the guts to do things the Apple way from the start, and just make one killer Android smartphone and get so much excitement around it that it could have dictated terms to carriers.  Too late now, I guess.  This fragmentation and other garbage would almost sway me to buy an iPhone, were it not for the fact that Google has such a good web/cloud-based ecosystem.  You got your email, your contacts, your calendar, your task list, maps, and on and on all from Google, and syncing all of that stuff to an Android phone is so seamless and automatic, you don't even have to fuss with it.  I also get free turn-by-turn navigation.  I can also stream my entire music collection, all stored free on Google Play Music, right to my phone.  If Apple had all of this cloud-based ecosystem (correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think iCloud is as comprehensive as Google is with all the cloud-based apps), I might reconsider iPhone.  Anyway, the Apple App Store does have Google Sync software, but for how long?  Apple for whatever reason could pull the plug on Google sync support tomorrow, which would leave me in a lurch if I owned an iPhone.  But I do hate Google's fragmentation issue.  I should be able, as a customer, to get whatever latest OS Google has to offer, with advanced features and bug fixes, without having to make an unnecessary trip down to the AT&T service center and wait in line (and even then it's not the latest OS anyway).  That's just plain horrible service.

Re: ANDROID UPDATES NEED ***SERIOUS*** REFORM!!!

10 of 29 (4,262 Views)
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
View profile
Sep 10, 2012 10:58:49 AM
0
(0)
Teacher

I'm so sick of having to go to AT&T (or any other carrier for that matter), hands out, begging for a software fix (after unnecessarily making a carbon footprint with my car and waiting in line), when I could just download the latest fix from Google and get the latest features in the process, if only Google would get a brain about all this and stick it to the carriers and the manufacturers.  They're certainly now in a position to do so, with Android being the #1 selling OS (by device) in the world.

Re: ANDROID UPDATES NEED ***SERIOUS*** REFORM!!!

11 of 29 (4,260 Views)
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
View profile
Sep 10, 2012 12:01:37 PM
0
(0)
ACE - Professor

ebinrock wrote:

I know, Google should have had the guts to do things the Apple way from the start, and just make one killer Android smartphone and get so much excitement around it that it could have dictated terms to carriers.  Too late now, I guess.  This fragmentation and other garbage would almost sway me to buy an iPhone, were it not for the fact that Google has such a good web/cloud-based ecosystem.  You got your email, your contacts, your calendar, your task list, maps, and on and on all from Google, and syncing all of that stuff to an Android phone is so seamless and automatic, you don't even have to fuss with it.  I also get free turn-by-turn navigation.  I can also stream my entire music collection, all stored free on Google Play Music, right to my phone.  If Apple had all of this cloud-based ecosystem (correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think iCloud is as comprehensive as Google is with all the cloud-based apps), I might reconsider iPhone.  Anyway, the Apple App Store does have Google Sync software, but for how long?  Apple for whatever reason could pull the plug on Google sync support tomorrow, which would leave me in a lurch if I owned an iPhone.  But I do hate Google's fragmentation issue.  I should be able, as a customer, to get whatever latest OS Google has to offer, with advanced features and bug fixes, without having to make an unnecessary trip down to the AT&T service center and wait in line (and even then it's not the latest OS anyway).  That's just plain horrible service.


If these things are important to you, why don't you have a Nexus device?  Every Nexus phone released so far works on AT&T.

 

By the way, it would be helpful if you quote the post that you are responding to.  It makes it easier for the reader to understand what you are saying.

 

*The views and opinions expressed on this forum are purely my own. Any product claim, statistic, quote, or other representation about a product or service should be verified with the manufacturer, provider, or party.

Re: ANDROID UPDATES NEED ***SERIOUS*** REFORM!!!

12 of 29 (4,245 Views)
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
View profile
Sep 10, 2012 1:01:19 PM
0
(0)
ACE - Professor
Edited by redpoint73 on Sep 10, 2012 at 1:05:02 PM

21stNow wrote:


 

If these things are important to you, why don't you have a Nexus device?  Every Nexus phone released so far works on AT&T.

 


That is an excellent idea.
Or just root and flash custom ROMs.  Jelly Bean has had stable ROMs on my phone for weeks now, while other people are still complaining about getting "official" ICS on their devices.  No need to wait for carriers or even manufacterers to get off their duff, when independent developers crank out stuff that is even better.

 

 

*The views and opinions expressed on this forum are purely my own. Any product claim, statistic, quote, or other representation about a product or service should be verified with the manufacturer, provider, or party.

Re: ANDROID UPDATES NEED ***SERIOUS*** REFORM!!!

[ Edited ]
13 of 29 (4,237 Views)
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
View profile
Sep 10, 2012 1:49:18 PM
0
(0)
Professor

21stNow wrote:

If these things are important to you, why don't you have a Nexus device?  Every Nexus phone released so far works on AT&T.

 

By the way, it would be helpful if you quote the post that you are responding to.  It makes it easier for the reader to understand what you are saying.

 


Yeah thats a good idea! Nexus devices are updated directly from Google (not the carriers) and are pretty good phones as well, and yes they do work on AT&T

Re: ANDROID UPDATES NEED ***SERIOUS*** REFORM!!!

14 of 29 (4,212 Views)
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
View profile
Sep 10, 2012 2:14:10 PM
0
(0)
Teacher
Sorry about the non-quotes, I just learned that "Quick Reply" should thread the responses properly. About the Nexus, yes, I've weighed everything out and came to the conclusion that I cannot get a true unlocked Nexus. The cost, while very reasonable for an unlocked smartphone, is still too high for me (I live almost paycheck to paycheck). Plus, I'm actually thinking of switching to Verizon because, after testing in all the carriers' stores, I found Verizon phones to be the clearest (even better than Sprint, and both of them use CDMA for voice). So that's the direction I'm going to go in, a Verizon Galaxy Nexus (also has LTE and 32 GB storage, which the unlocked version does not). I can get that phone, which is virtually bloat-free, for dirt cheap. Sucks that that phone isn't a TRUE Nexus, though -- the carrier still controls the updates. BTW, you people who say it's the mfrs. fault for the delayed updates, well, this bizarre thing with the Galaxy Nexus proves that wrong. With the unlocked G'Nex, users still get immediate updates for the phone from Google. Samsung makes the Nexus. Yet, with a CDMA version of that same Nexus, also made by Samsung, the carriers control the update. You get the update from the carrier. There's a disconnect (no pun intended) here.

Re: ANDROID UPDATES NEED ***SERIOUS*** REFORM!!!

15 of 29 (4,207 Views)
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
View profile
Sep 10, 2012 2:48:06 PM
0
(0)
ACE - Professor
Edited by 21stNow on Sep 10, 2012 at 2:51:22 PM

Please check the VZW forums for all the complaints against the VZW Galaxy Nexus.  I'm a Nexus fan and there's no way that I would get that device. I have had Jellybean (officially) on the GSM Galaxy Nexus for around two months now.  The VZW Galaxy Nexus is still on Ice Cream Sandwich.  There were also extensive reception issues reported with that phone.  Some say that an update cleared that up, while some say that it didn't.  I also got access to Google Wallet a lot faster than VZW customers did (without hacking).

 

However, I understand that price can be a factor in determining the phone that you want.  Still, if you go to VZW, I would recommend looking at a device other than the VZW Galaxy Nexus.  Edited to add:  I almost would suggest getting a used Nexus S if the issues that you mentioned earlier are that important to you, but I really don't like Android 4.0 and higher on a single-core processor phone.  For me, Jellybean actually fixed some of the problems that I had with ICS on the Nexus S, but I still wouldn't recommend it.

 

I don't think that Quick Reply threads the responses in a different way, but it could be the way that I view the forum.

*The views and opinions expressed on this forum are purely my own. Any product claim, statistic, quote, or other representation about a product or service should be verified with the manufacturer, provider, or party.

Re: ANDROID UPDATES NEED ***SERIOUS*** REFORM!!!

[ Edited ]
16 of 29 (4,197 Views)
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
View profile
Sep 11, 2012 7:22:15 AM
0
(0)
ACE - Professor

I'd caution the OP about switching carriers just to get a certain device.  Devices come and go, but you're stuck with the service for 2 years (or cancellation fees) or longer.  Although if you look at the big picture (reception in your area, plan features and prices, etc.) and still think its the right move, than by all means, go for it. 

 

If you haven't already, at least ask friends, coworkers, etc. in your area how Verizon reception is (and in areas that you spend lots of time, if your travel on the weekends, etc.).  Although I will say that Verizon tends to get better reception than AT&T in my general area (New England), and the times I've travelled to other parts of the country with friends that are on Verizon.

*The views and opinions expressed on this forum are purely my own. Any product claim, statistic, quote, or other representation about a product or service should be verified with the manufacturer, provider, or party.

Re: ANDROID UPDATES NEED ***SERIOUS*** REFORM!!!

17 of 29 (4,063 Views)
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
View profile
Sep 11, 2012 7:25:31 AM
0
(0)
Professor

I am seriously considering Windows Phone.  Microsoft is supposed to be responsible for athe OS updates, instead of the carriers.  Also, Microsoft is dictating what specs the phones can have, so the Microsoft just uses the appropriate driver, rather than customising the OS for each of the various devices.  Limiting the device specs is one of the things that keeps Apple from having many OS problems.  I am also getting very sick and tired of the ads in everything associated with Google, and the way Google tracks everything to sell to third party marketers.  Too bad, really, Android has a lot of potential.  

Re: ANDROID UPDATES NEED ***SERIOUS*** REFORM!!!

18 of 29 (4,059 Views)
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
View profile
Sep 11, 2012 7:31:52 AM
0
(0)
ACE - Professor

FredW wrote:

I am seriously considering Windows Phone.  Microsoft is supposed to be responsible for athe OS updates, instead of the carriers.  Also, Microsoft is dictating what specs the phones can have, so the Microsoft just uses the appropriate driver, rather than customising the OS for each of the various devices.  Limiting the device specs is one of the things that keeps Apple from having many OS problems.  I am also getting very sick and tired of the ads in everything associated with Google, and the way Google tracks everything to sell to third party marketers.  Too bad, really, Android has a lot of potential.  


Tread carefully with this one.  Just ask Windows Phone users about the Tango update.  While that update may have come quicker than Android updates do, it did not come when released to international and unlocked versions of the phones (using Nokia as an example) similar to the situation that we find ourselves in with Android.

 

*The views and opinions expressed on this forum are purely my own. Any product claim, statistic, quote, or other representation about a product or service should be verified with the manufacturer, provider, or party.

Re: ANDROID UPDATES NEED ***SERIOUS*** REFORM!!!

19 of 29 (4,051 Views)
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
View profile
Sep 11, 2012 7:50:41 AM
0
(0)
ACE - Professor
Edited by redpoint73 on Sep 11, 2012 at 8:01:01 AM

FredW wrote:

I am seriously considering Windows Phone.  Microsoft is supposed to be responsible for athe OS updates, instead of the carriers.  Also, Microsoft is dictating what specs the phones can have, so the Microsoft just uses the appropriate driver, rather than customising the OS for each of the various devices.  Limiting the device specs is one of the things that keeps Apple from having many OS problems.  I am also getting very sick and tired of the ads in everything associated with Google, and the way Google tracks everything to sell to third party marketers.  Too bad, really, Android has a lot of potential.  


I personally wouldn't recommend that somebody switch to a smartphone OS that has a 3% market share and dropping.  And that 3% includes people that own old Windows Mobile phones and still haven't upgraded, an OS that isn't even really supported by MS anymore.  Unless Windows 8 brings about a completely revolutionary change in the WP market share, I simply don't see the OS being long for this world.

 

*The views and opinions expressed on this forum are purely my own. Any product claim, statistic, quote, or other representation about a product or service should be verified with the manufacturer, provider, or party.

Re: ANDROID UPDATES NEED ***SERIOUS*** REFORM!!!

[ Edited ]
20 of 29 (4,044 Views)
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
View profile
Sep 11, 2012 8:29:40 AM
0
(0)
Guru
Edited by Entropy512 on Sep 11, 2012 at 8:33:09 AM

In the case of the Cappy - Samsung is responsible for that device not receiving ICS.  No Galaxy S1-family device received it because Touchwizz is too bloated to fit.

 

HOWEVER, AT&T is 100% responsible for the fact that the Captivate took on the order of 6-9 months to receive Gingerbread after the I9000 released it, AND AT&T is 100% responsible for any issues present in the Captivate Gingerbread release that are not present in I9000 Gingerbread.

 

Similarly, AT&T is 100% responsible for the 3 month delay or so of SGH-I777 ICS compared to GT-I9100 ICS, and they also maintain 100% responsibility for the fact that the three firmware releases for the SGH-I777, when ranked against Samsung's GT-I9100 firmware releases, rank as the three worst firmwares available.  UCKH7 had a widget that would eat massive amounts of data even if you didn't use it, UCKK6 had a massive pile of power management problems (Which did exist in ONE I9100 firmware release, but users that received that I9100 update received a fix within two weeks - AT&T users had to live with broken firmware for 5-7 months), and UCLE5 has jacked-up touchscreen drivers and still continues to have broken power management.

 

If you want good devices, DO NOT switch to Verizon or Sprint - being CDMA providers, you are FORCED to obtain devices from the carrier.  AT&T and T-Mobile (and their MVNO resellers, such as Straight Talk) are the only carriers that you can BYOD on.  T-Mobile's use of the 1700 MHz band for 3G severely restricts device compatibility - the Galaxy Nexus is the only device I am aware of compatible with their network that isn't sold by T-Mobile themselves.  AT&T's bands are better supported by international devices.  My personal recommendation, which is likely to be my course of action when my contract is up, is to switch to Straight Talk - They are an AT&T reseller, but unlike AT&T, do not force you to pay a contract subsidy penalty even if you do not have a subsidized device.  If AT&T ever allows a discount for users that do not have a subsidized device, I may change this recommendation, but right now, you have the choice of mangled devices, or paying for a subsidy discount you aren't using.

Re: ANDROID UPDATES NEED ***SERIOUS*** REFORM!!!

[ Edited ]
21 of 29 (4,032 Views)
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
View profile
Sep 11, 2012 8:43:49 AM
0
(0)
Professor
IMO Sprint and Verizon are one of the worst companies to switch too...although AT&T customer service is pretty bad, their service is the best!

Re: ANDROID UPDATES NEED ***SERIOUS*** REFORM!!!

22 of 29 (4,012 Views)
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
View profile
Sep 11, 2012 9:43:35 AM
0
(0)
Professor
I think the at&t and Verizon services differ depending on where you are. Each one has areas of the country where they are better than the other. People I have known with Sprint say the service is excellent where there is service, but you don't have service everywhere. T mobile is not bad if you never leave a metropolitan area, or major highways, and is trying to get out of the US market.

Re: ANDROID UPDATES NEED ***SERIOUS*** REFORM!!!

23 of 29 (3,994 Views)
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
View profile
Sep 12, 2012 12:13:01 AM
0
(0)
Professor

You want updates straight from Google? Get a Nexus and move on with your life...

Re: ANDROID UPDATES NEED ***SERIOUS*** REFORM!!!

24 of 29 (3,908 Views)
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
View profile
Sep 23, 2012 5:16:10 PM
0
(0)
Contributor
I bought the Nexus S a year ago. Yes,I can go out and find OS updates, but AT&T stands between me and Google.

When I check the OS status on my phone, it claims to be up to date. I'm running 2.3.4. I previously used an iPhone 3G and OS upgrades were pushed seamlessly.

At this point, I'm running the experiment to see how many years the delay will be between the time Google makes the update available and AT&T allows the customer to receive it as an OTA update.

Re: ANDROID UPDATES NEED ***SERIOUS*** REFORM!!!

25 of 29 (3,304 Views)
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
View profile
Feb 1, 2013 10:47:10 AM
0
(0)
Contributor
Edited by dbmdude1959 on Feb 1, 2013 at 10:49:42 AM

I agree with a lot of what you are saying ebinrock!

 

I think the following changes should be done to the update system:

  1. Allow people to see ALL changes both adds and deletes before agreeing to take the update.  I do not like the absence of transparency.
  2. Allow people to refuse the update knowing that if they refuse that update that all future updates will stop -- meaning they have to get them in order.  I do not like being forced.
  3. Allow people to select / deselect non-consequential applications that are currently required by ATT.  I also do not like some of the applications I am forced to have.

I fully understand why ATT has a different update process outside of Google (even though I too do not like it) and that is they want to retain control over the phone while the contract is in place.  The problem with this is that they are causing many customers to be very unhappy by "controlling it so tightly".  You are making us all feel like we have no control over our own phones.  I think some of those controls should GO AWAY.  I am a grown man in my 50s and I have a clean legal record and I do no drugs of any kind and I have a good job / career.... why am I treated as a 2 year old by ATT?

 

Eric Joy

 

 

Re: ANDROID UPDATES NEED ***SERIOUS*** REFORM!!!

[ Edited ]
26 of 29 (2,371 Views)
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
View profile
Feb 3, 2013 12:58:06 PM
0
(0)
Contributor

I decided to write ATT about this.... please review my letter that I will be sending out on Monday!

 

February 3, 2013

AT&T Wireless

PO Box 1809

Paramus, NJ 07653

 

Dear Sir / Madam:

 

I am writing you today because I have a concern about your service.  First off you must know this letter comes from many situations like this and only serves to finally tell you about a part of your service that I think is seriously lacking.

 

Secondly, before I start I must tell you that from a pure customer service perspective that your company is actually not that bad… you must know that it is not the “customer service” I am complaining about here.  If I had to put the complaints into one category (and clearly you will see later it does not fit into one) I guess it would be under technical service.  Notice I said “technical service” and not “technical support”.  I purposely said it like that because I feel what you people offer is clearly NOT technical support.  In the time I have been an AT&T or Cingular customer I have on three or four occasions wanted to cancel and move to another carrier and nearly did once.  There are other carriers that are not quite so restrictive and I have considered jumping ship on many occasions to one of them.

 

There are five areas where I feel the AT&T philosophy fails greatly.  All of these points relate back to my phone (Samsung Galaxy S3 SGH-I747), my family’s phones (mixture of Samsung Galaxy S2’s and S3’s), my friends phone (also a S3) and my service.  There is also a story in here that relates to an old Motorola Razr that I had years ago.  Here are the fine points of my letter:

 

  1. AT&T Update Service for Android phones should tell you the update you are receiving and it clearly does not.  So people are forced to take an update clearly not knowing what it is about and what it is for.
  2. AT&T Update Service for Android phones updates via the 4G connection when it should not.  What if people have low bandwidth packages and cannot afford that.  This item is not 100% substantiated but I cannot get an AT&T customer service representative to confirm it for me, more on this later on.
  3. AT&T Update Service for Android phones forces an update on these phones.  You are given three opportunities to postpone and then it finally forces the update on you.
  4. AT&T Customer Service clearly has no clue.  Most of them do not know what the update number is a person is receiving and some even though they might find the version number clearly do not know how to tell the customer what is in the update OR where to find it.
  5. AT&T Update Service for Android phones does NOT consistently get applied to all phones.

NOW let me expound upon the previous bullet statements.

 

I have been a loyal AT&T (before that Cingular) customer for a very long time.  I have paid enough money into your company to probably put a few families through college.  I am over fifty years old and feel sometimes like AT&T treats me like I am twelve.

I bought my S3 in the summer last year (along with three other Galaxy S2’s for the family) and then later bought my wife an S3 and she gave her S2 to my daughter.  Shortly after buying my phone I started hearing rumblings about how the “Siri like” features would be removed in the Jelly Bean update, then I had the update warning on my phone that (again as I stated previously) tells you nothing.  I called AT&T customer service three times and finally got somewhat of an answer.  The first person I spoke told me there is no way to stop the updates and he had no idea where to find out what was updating.  The second person I spoke to told me he could look up the update number (and did) but did not tell me how to find it and certainly did not tell me what was in the update.  The third person I spoke to not only took the time to find the update number, she also found what was contained in the update and pointed me to where I could find that information if I wanted to.  NOW of course since the AT&T Update Service on my phone tells me NOTHING… I cannot look it up unless I contact AT&T first and only if I can get someone “with a clue”.  My point here is “Why can’t the update service give you a version number or other information so I can look up what this update means?”

 

During the time I was speaking to that third person above she also researched and told me that the AT&T Update Service works like this: (1) You are allowed to postpone the update three times, (2) Once you postpone it your third time you are forced to take it and finally (3) The update service only updates the software via Wifi or PC, not over 4G.  Flash forward to last week (Week of 1/28/2013)… On my phone was another update notification of which I saw and immediately disabled my Wifi and postponed the update.  I was planning on trying to call AT&T to find out what it was about but did not have time at the moment.  On Thursday, 1/31/2013, I was in a meeting and had my android phone sitting next to me and saw the update service issue the second attempt to update.  Since I was told they never update except over Wifi and PC I tapped the “Continue” button and (based on past experience) assumed it would not install (fail due to no wifi connection)… well it did not fail… it loaded.  Now there are several possibilities here I have not had the chance to interrogate.  It is possible that I was on the ATT Wifi network but doubt it.  I was planning on checking that this next week.  I also KNOW for a fact I was not on a company Wifi because no personal phones are allowed on that network and as such mine has never been connected and in fact cannot be connected because it requires a certificate I cannot install on my personal phone.  Now I ask of you, “Why does my AT&T Update Service allow for an update of a major type to be installed over my 4G service?”

 

Also as a result of my conversation above with that third party, I just want to know why AT&T feels the need to control my phone so much that they force updates on me?  I feel like I am being treated like a kid.  I fully understand some level of control over the phone because it is under contract but not to this level.  I think most people would respect you more if you allowed them to choose what updates they wanted and at what time they wanted them.  Now having said that I understand that there are scenarios where the security of your network is in jeopardy… I get that.  If a person was asked to get 4.0.4 when they had 4.0.3 and they refuse it then they either would not be able to update to any future updates OR maybe the other updates are included in future ones.  This way the feature enhancements would naturally force people to update over time.  For example if the person has 4.0.3 and they refuse 4.0.4 and 4.0.5 due to concerns over something they read in the release notes or blogs... then along comes 4.1 and has a bunch of really cool features… they have the incentive to get the update now.  Also if a major update to something like Play Store is causing it to not work in an older version then they might also choose to update to that major release in order to restore Play Store.  There are other examples of “control” AT&T has over the phone that are ridiculous (e.g. Removing features people like, adding applications people do not want, etc) and I think if you treat people with a little more respect, you might increase your user base.  So my question here is, “Why <explitive> do you control the phone so tightly and why <explitive> do you force people to update when they might not want to?”

 

Even though my fourth point was previously made, I have another story to tell you about how clueless your team is when it comes to this.  A long time ago I bought what was then a brand new Motorola Razr.  I bought it because on your own website it advertised it had a feature (which was new at that time) that allowed stereo ring tones.  After receiving the phone and trying to load stereo tones and it did not work (they loaded but would not play) I contacted AT&T Customer Service and they said the phone was broke and had another “refurbished” one shipped to me.  This repeated itself nearly three times but on the third phone I asked when I called AT&T to get a Motorola person on the phone with us and coincidentally we ended up with the Motorola Engineer that was lead on the Razr product.  NOW I asked (AT&T rep stayed silent at this point) the Motorola Engineer why the tones would not work and he said because it is not designed to.  After that I realized that one of the following scenarios was happening: (1) Motorola purposely mislead AT&T, (2) Motorola miscommunicated the feature to AT&T, (3) AT&T misunderstood the feature and had it trained like that OR (4) AT&T new of the feature and purposely false advertised.  In any case, AT&T allowed me to return the Razr (even though now I was clearly outside of the return period) and get a different phone.  My point here is this is not an isolated incident… I can sight you many times where I ask AT&T basic (I state again “BASIC”) feature questions and they cannot answer them.  NOW I know they are not expected to have all the answers but isn’t there a database of answers that they can tap into?  Isn’t there training they go on new products?  In some of the cases where I call and ask these feature or technical questions the answer I get is “I do not know” and that might be OK because they most often try and find the answer but also sometimes I get an answer that is inaccurate because either they are not trained well OR they do not want to take the time to verify the answer.

 

On a completely different side note (related to the above) I ask “Why do you send refurbished phones to a person that has a brand new one and it is still under warranty?”  That is pure stupidity.  If I buy a new phone and discover something wrong with it while it is still under warranty, I DO NOT WANT someone else’s phone that was “refurbished”… I want another NEW PHONE!

 

Ever since my first FORCED update on my Galaxy S3 I have been asking around and researching and discovered a couple of things.  I know of two people that also have the Galaxy S3 that I have looked at their “About screen” and found that they are NOT getting updates at all and I am, why is that?  NOW that could be timing but help me understand why NONE of the Galaxy S2’s that I bought BEFORE my Galaxy S3 in my house has ever received forced updates?  The AT&T Update Service is not even loaded on them.  What <explitive> is going on?  Why am I being targeted?  I understand I am not actually being targeted BUT clearly there is a consistency issue here.

 

One last note related to my second point above.  After getting nowhere with AT&T I finally decided to contact Samsung and I asked them a series of questions.  I asked them if they are forcing the updates and they said NO... this is an AT&T policy.  They further said they provide the updates on their website for people to get at their leisure.  I also asked why my phone was updating via 4G and the person said that every update has the characteristic of being an OTW (Over the wire) or OTA (Over the air) update and that my recent update to 4.1 should NEVER have been OTA.  He further stated that he was confused on how the phone did an OTA 4G update.  He said that is not the way it is supposed to work and that they will investigate.  So having said this all, it looks like where many customer service agents tried to blame Samsung for the forced updates that clearly is NOT true.  This is clearly an AT&T requirement and it is STUPID at that.

 

In closing, I ask you to make the following changes:

 

  1. The AT&T Update Service MUST show you the version number and tell you what the changes are including the enhancements AND the deletions.  Maybe have a link to a website that spells this out.  Also not mentioned above, you MUST explain why a feature was removed!
  2. Allow people to remove AT&T branded force-ware unless it is critical to the operation or security of the phone.
  3. You need to get with Samsung and together find out WHY the phone did an OTA 4G update and FIX IT!
  4. Allow customers to accept or refuse the updates to android phones if they choose and of course if they reject an update they are not going to be able to take any future ones until they do.  Use positive motivation (cool enhancements) to lure people into updates instead of treating them like kids.  Maybe have a choice of automatic updates or not and put a setting for that in a parental control area so parents can make sure there kids phones update.  I understand, some of this will require coordination with the manufacturer.
  5. Train your customer service people better in the technical aspects of the phones; maybe partner with the companies you buy from better and have a couple of their technicians on staff with AT&T for technical excellence for your teams.  This can benefit the manufacturer also so it is a Win-Win.
  6. STOP the practice of automatically sending someone a refurbished phone if it is under warranty. 

Sincerely,

Loyal Customer for over 10 years

 

Copy To:

Samsung: Telecommunications - Mobile Phones and Wireless Products PR (via email)

Re: ANDROID UPDATES NEED ***SERIOUS*** REFORM!!!

27 of 29 (2,170 Views)
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
View profile
Feb 8, 2013 1:05:58 AM
0
(0)
Tutor
Edited by hardboil on Feb 8, 2013 at 1:07:33 AM

Switch to Nexus phone if you want timely updates and less adware.

Re: ANDROID UPDATES NEED ***SERIOUS*** REFORM!!!

[ Edited ]
28 of 29 (1,906 Views)
0
(0)
  • Rate this reply
View profile
Feb 9, 2013 2:57:13 AM
0
(0)
Scholar
He's right just switch already to a nexus is only 299 or 349. That just can't be beat.

Re: ANDROID UPDATES NEED ***SERIOUS*** REFORM!!!

29 of 29 (1,825 Views)
Share this post
Share this post